Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Aug 29, 2012 · Patent. Jury Delivers $1.05B Verdict for Apple in Patent Case By Jeffery Habenicht – Edited by Jennifer Wong Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., 11-CV-1846-LHK (N.D.Cal Aug. 24, 2012) Jury Verdict Form hosted by SB Nation After two-and-a-half days of deliberation, a nine-person jury returned a $1.05 billion verdict against Samsung ...

  2. Opinion. Case No. C 11–1846 LHK (PSG). 2012-07-25. APPLE INC., Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; Samsung Electronics America, Inc., a New York corporation; and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. At the same time, it generally is recognized that when a ...

  3. Oct 11, 2016 · Brief amicus curiae of Systems, Inc. filed. Feb 3 2016: Brief of respondent Apple Inc. in opposition filed. Feb 16 2016: Reply of petitioner Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. filed. Feb 17 2016: DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 4, 2016. Mar 14 2016: DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 18, 2016. Mar 21 2016

  4. 2 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. v. APPLE INC. Opinion of the Court I A . The federal patent laws have long permitted those who invent designs for manufactured articles to patent their designs. See Patent Act of 1842, §3, 5 Stat. 543–544. Patent protection is available for a “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture ...

  5. Get Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 786 F.3d 983 (2015), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.

  6. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al Doc. 1965 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 ...

  7. Oct 7, 2016 · Apple alleged infringement of five patents that cover various aspects of the operation of smartphones. The district court granted summary judgment that Samsung’s accused devices infringed the 172 patent; a jury found the 647 and 721 patents infringed, infringed and not invalid. The court awarded Apple $119,625,000 in damages and ongoing royalties. The jury found that Samsung had not ...

  1. People also search for