Search results
Aug 29, 2012 · The jury found that, in 24 of its phones and tablets, Samsung had infringed on all three utility patents and three of four design patents that Apple had asserted. The jury rejected Samsung’s defense that the patents were invalid.
Oct 22, 2017 · Full title: APPLE INC., Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD., et al., Defendants. Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION. Date published: Oct 22, 2017
May 14, 2012 · Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elec. Co., Ltd., No. 12-1105 (Fed. Cir. 2012) Apple claimed that Samsung smartphones, the Galaxy S and the Infuse, and its Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet infringed four Apple patents. Apple sought a preliminary injunction to block importation and U.S. sales.
Oct 11, 2016 · Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on December 6, 2016. SCOTUSblog Coverage. Opinion analysis: Justices tread narrow path in rejecting $400 million award for Samsung’s infringement of Apple’s cellphone design patents (Ronald Mann, December 6, 2016)
As relevant here, a jury found that various smartphones manufac-tured by petitioners (collectively, Samsung) infringed design patents owned by respondent Apple Inc. that covered a rectangular front face with rounded edges and a grid of colorful icons on a black screen.
Oct 11, 2016 · Apple and Samsung will appear before the US Supreme Court on Tuesday to argue why their opponent was wrong when it came to a patent case from 2012. This is the first time a design patent case...
Rule of Law. The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in. Issue. The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.
