Search results
People also ask
What is the Asiatic Barred Zone Act?
What is the 'Asiatic Barred Zone'?
Why was the Asiatic Barred Zone passed?
Who is a 'barred zone'?
The Immigration Act of 1917 (also known as the Literacy Act or the Burnett Act and less often as the Asiatic Barred Zone Act) was a United States Act that aimed to restrict immigration by imposing literacy tests on immigrants, creating new categories of inadmissible persons, and barring immigration from the Asia-Pacific zone.
- An Act to regulate the immigration of aliens to, and the residence of aliens in, the United States.
- the 64th United States Congress
- Asiatic Barred Zone Act
Learn about the 1917 Immigration Act that created a "barred zone" from the Middle East to Southeast Asia and required a literacy test for all aliens entering the United States. The law also exempted some classes of immigrants from the literacy test and reduced the number of European immigrants.
The act imposed a literacy test and a tax on immigrants, and excluded all from the "Asiatic zone" based on racism and eugenics. Learn how the U.S. grappled with immigration a century ago and how it affects us today.
Jul 17, 2015 · In 1917, a new piece of immigration legislation was passed by Congress that expanded the list of reasons why individuals could be excluded from entry to the United States, a literacy test was added, and what became known as the Asiatic Barred Zone was created.
Feb 16, 2021 · The Immigration Act of 1917 created an Asiatic barred zone that banned immigration from British India, most of Southeast Asia, the Pacific Islands, and the Middle East. The law also required a literacy test and excluded certain categories of immigrants, such as homosexuals, anarchists, and the mentally ill.
- Robert Longley
Jul 1, 2019 · A few decades later, the Immigration Act of 1917 established an “Asiatic barred zone” banning almost all immigration from Asia. Still, it wasn’t a crime to violate these acts. The U.S. could...
Apr 12, 2017 · Asiatic Barred Zone of 1917 ( Wikimedia Commons) Their reception was not kind. Newspapers reported in sensationalist fashion that these “dusky Asiatics” and “Hindu hordes” posed a bigger threat to job security and the cultural fabric than Japanese or Chinese laborers.
