Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact—such as a fingerprint at the scene of a crime. By contrast, direct evidence supports the truth of an assertion directly—i.e., without need for any additional evidence or inference. Overview.

  2. Circumstantial evidence is proof of a fact or set of facts from which one could infer the fact in question. For example, that a suspect is seen running away from a murder scene with a weapon in hand is circumstantial evidence he committed the murder. This contrasts with direct evidence, which directly proves the fact in question.

  3. Circumstantial evidence, in law, evidence not drawn from direct observation of a fact in issue. If a witness testifies that he saw a defendant fire a bullet into the body of a person who then died, this is direct testimony of material facts in murder, and the only question is whether the witness is.

  4. circumstantial evidence. Definition of "circumstantial evidence". Evidence that infers a fact indirectly, rather than proving it directly, often used alongside other pieces of evidence to establish proof beyond reasonable doubt. How to use "circumstantial evidence" in a sentence.

  5. noun. proof of facts offered as evidence from which other facts are to be inferred ( direct evidence ). circumstantial evidence. noun. indirect evidence that tends to establish a conclusion by inference Compare direct evidence. Discover More. Word History and Origins. Origin of circumstantial evidence 1. First recorded in 1730–40. Discover More.

  6. Circumstantial Evidence. Information and testimony presented by a party in a civil or criminal action that permit conclusions that indirectly establish the existence or nonexistence of a fact or event that the party seeks to prove. Circumstantial Evidence is also known as indirect evidence.

  7. Evidence directed to the attending circumstances ; evidence which inferentially proves the principal fact by establishing a condition of surrounding and limiting circumstances, whose existence is a premise from which the existence of the principal fact may be concluded by necessary laws of reasoning. State v.

  1. People also search for