Search results
Feb 15, 2016 · Consequentialism is a theory that says whether something is good or bad depends on its outcomes. An action that brings about more benefit than harm is good, while an action that causes more harm than benefit is not. The most famous version of this theory is utilitarianism.
Consequentialism, In ethics, the doctrine that actions should be judged right or wrong on the basis of their consequences. The simplest form of consequentialism is classical (or hedonistic) utilitarianism, which asserts that an action is right or wrong according to whether it maximizes the net.
In ethical philosophy, consequentialism is a class of normative, teleological ethical theories that holds that the consequences of one's conduct are the ultimate basis for judgement about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct.
Dec 31, 2003 · Rule Consequentialism. First published Wed Dec 31, 2003; substantive revision Sun Jan 15, 2023. The theory of morality we can call full rule-consequentialism selects rules solely in terms of the goodness of their consequences and then claims that these rules determine which kinds of acts are morally wrong.
Consequentialism is the view that morality is all about producing the right kinds of overall consequences. Here the phrase “overall consequences” of an action means everything the action brings about, including the action itself.
Feb 24, 2021 · Different consequentialists offer different accounts of value, but all give a prominent place to the promotion of human well-being. Consequentialism can evaluate acts, rules, motives, or political institutions. This entry focuses on contemporary consequentialism, but also explores its roots in classical utilitarianism.
Jan 12, 2009 · WHAT IS CONSEQUENTIALISM? Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2009. Elinor Mason. Article. Metrics. Save PDF. Abstract. Elinor Mason explains and contrasts consequentialist and duty-based theories of ethics. Type. Research Article. Information. Think , Volume 8 , Issue 21 , Spring 2009 , pp. 19 - 28.
