Search results
Reviews, essays, best sellers and children's books coverage from The New York Times Book Review.
That means no matter what your beliefs are, this book is going to get uncomfortable at times. The Bible is a complex and nuanced book with a complex and nuanced history. But that’s what happens when 2.8 billion people believe a single book contains the most important message in the world. You’re bound to have disagreements, both inside and
- 6MB
- 306
People also ask
Why was the fountainhead so important?
Is the Fountainhead a man-worship?
What is the bond between Frank and The Fountainhead?
How do you communicate the fountainhead's sense of life?
The New York Times Best Seller list is widely considered the preeminent list of best-selling books in the United States. [1] [2] Since October 12, 1931, The New York Times Book Review has published the list weekly. [1] In the 21st century, it has evolved into multiple lists, grouped by genre and format, including fiction and nonfiction ...
THE BOOK Although fewer in number, The Fountainhead reviews were of greater significance, both professionally and personally; in fact, her 1960–1961 biographical interviews contain comments on many of these reviews. Heading that list—in fact, heading her list of all-time favorite reviews—was that in the New York Times Book Review (May 16 ...
The first five books of the Bible, the Pentateuch or Torah, have a long literary history. These books are the work of several writers who incorporated earlier texts and traditions to compose these books. The four primary sources that are incorporated into these books
Frank was the fuel. He gave me, in the hours of my own days, the reality of that sense of life, which created The Fountainhead--and he helped me to maintain it over a long span of years. when there was nothing around us but a gray desert of people and events that evoked nothing. but contempt and revulsion.
dictionary which gave such misleading definitions of these two words that "egotist" seemed closer to the meaning I intended (Webster's Daily Use Dictionary, 1933). (Modern philosophers, however, are guiltier than lexicographers in regard to these two terms.) The possibly misleading sentence is in Roark's speech: "From this simplest necessity to the
