Search results
2 days ago · Do No Harm: Protecting healthcare from the disastrous consequences of identity politics. Since our launch in April 2022, our successes include: 6,400+ Members. 800+ Tipline submissions. 390+ FOIA requests. 150+ OCR complaints. 7,500+ Media hits.
- Protecting Minors From Gender Ideology
Do No Harm is committed to ensuring that children who...
- Newsroom
Have you seen a radical, divisive ideology creep into...
- About Us
About Us. Do No Harm represents physicians, nurses, medical...
- Events
July 12, 2023 at 6:00 pm | Charlottesville, VA; How To Save...
- Donate
Do No Harm 11357 Nuckols Road PMB 115 Glen Allen, VA 23059....
- Resources
Become a Member. Help us protect patients, physicians, and...
- Research
The Ohio State University College of Medicine: A destination...
- Disclaimer
A reader assumes full responsibility for any actions taken...
- Protecting Minors From Gender Ideology
- So Why The Confusion?
- Is "First, Do No Harm" Even Possible?
- How Practical Is "First, Do No Harm"?
- The Bottom Line
- GeneratedCaptionsTabForHeroSec
Admittedly, there is similar language found in both places. For example, here's a line from one translation of the Hippocratic Oath: "I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous." Yes, the pledger commits to avoi...
The idea that doctors should, as a starting point, not harm their patients is an appealing one. But doesn't that set the bar rather low? Of courseno physician should set out to do something that will only be accompanied by predictable and preventable harm. We don't need an ancient ancestor, however well-respected, or an oath to convince us of that!...
Imagine the following situations: 1. Your diagnosis is clear — say, strep throat — and there's an effective treatment available that carries only minor risks. Here, "first, do no harm" is not particularly relevant or useful. 2. Your diagnosis isn'tclear and the optimal course of testing or treatment is uncertain — for example, you have back pain or...
The fact is that when difficult, real-time decisions must be made, it's hard to apply the "first, do no harm" dictum because estimates of risk and benefit are so uncertain and prone to error. But it isa reminder that we need high-quality research to help us better understand the balance of risk and benefit for the tests and treatments we recommend....
Learn the origin and meaning of the phrase "first, do no harm" and how it relates to medical practice. Find out why it may not be as practical or helpful as you might think.
- 4 Blackfan Circle, 4th Floor, Boston, 02115, MA
- hhp_info@health.harvard.edu
- (877) 649-9457
The medical dictum primum non nocere (first, do no harm) is usually attributed to Hippocrates, and a poignant modern example of the injunction’s warning lies in the balance between the legitimate value and inappropriate use of the substances derived from the opium poppy plant. Provisional estimates suggest that nearly 65,000 Americans died from an overdose of drugs in 2016, a 21 percent ...
- National Academy of Medicine
- 2023/08/07
Jun 4, 2020 · The first 2 can be traced back to the time of Hippocrates “to help and do no harm,” while the latter 2 evolved later. Thus, in Percival's book on ethics in early 1800s, the importance of keeping the patient's best interest as a goal is stressed, while autonomy and justice were not discussed.
- Basil Varkey
- 10.1159/000509119
- 2020
- Med Princ Pract. 2021 Feb; 30(1): 17-28.
People also ask
What is do no harm?
Is first do no harm part of the Hippocratic Oath?
Where did the word 'first do no harm' come from?
Should a physician do a 'first do no harm' oath?
Oct 20, 2019 · The expression "first do no harm" is a popular saying that derives from the Latin phrase, "primum non nocere", which means "primum nil nocere". It is not part of the original or modern versions of the Hippocratic oath, which was written in Greek. The oath does contain language suggesting that the physician and his assistants should not cause physical or moral harm to a patient.
Dec 6, 2019 · The principle of “do no harm” remains a major concern for all the religious groups. The notion “do no harm” embodies the medical ethics principle of “non-maleficence”, that is to refrain from doing any harm first, before doing any good. The question is whether the research on a 5-day-old embryo inflicts harm on the embryo.
