Search results
Eclipse Public License - v 1.0. THE ACCOMPANYING PROGRAM IS PROVIDED UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS ECLIPSE PUBLIC LICENSE ("AGREEMENT"). ANY USE, REPRODUCTION OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE PROGRAM CONSTITUTES RECIPIENT'S ACCEPTANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT. 1.
- Eclipse Public License 1.0 (EPL) Frequently Asked Questions
The EPL 1.0 was written specifically for the Eclipse...
- Eclipse Public License 1.0
The Eclipse Foundation is home to the Eclipse IDE, Jakarta...
- Eclipse Public License - Eclipsepedia
The Eclipse Public License (EPL) is the software license...
- EPLv2: A New Version of the Eclipse Public License
Friday, April 7, 2017 - 14:17 by Mike Milinkovich. The...
- Eclipse Public License 1.0 (EPL) Frequently Asked Questions
The EPL 1.0 was written specifically for the Eclipse Foundation. First, it changes the Agreement Steward, formerly IBM for the CPL, to now be the Eclipse Foundation for the EPL. Second, it addresses concerns some Eclipse Foundation members had with how the CPL deals with possible patent litigation.
The Eclipse Foundation is home to the Eclipse IDE, Jakarta EE, and hundreds of open source projects, including runtimes, tools, specifications, and frameworks for cloud and edge applications, IoT, AI, automotive, systems engineering, open processor designs, and many others.
- History of The Eclipse Public License
- Eclipse Public License: Key Provisions
- 1.0 vs. Epl-2.0
- Eclipse Public License vs. Other Weak Copyleft Licenses
- Eclipse Public License: The Bottom Line
The original version 1.0 of the Eclipse Public License was based on IBM’s Common Public License (CPL). There were two primary differences between the CPL and EPL-1.0. 1. IBM served as the agreement steward for the CPL, while the Eclipse Foundation is the agreement steward for the EPL 2. The EPL removed the following sentence from the CPL that cover...
As a weak copyleft license, the EPL is a middle ground of sorts between permissive options (like the MIT License or Apache License 2.0) and strong copyleft licenses (like GPL v2 and GPL v3.) A core requirement of the EPL — one that’s not part of permissive licenses — is that derivative works of EPL-licensed code must also be licensed under the EPL....
As mentioned, there are four major differences between the original version of the Eclipse Public License (EPL-1.0) and the current EPL-2.0. 1. In contrast to the original, the EPL-2.0 is suitable for scripting languages such as JavaScript, PHP, Python, and Ruby, among others. This is because the EPL-2.0 both defines source code and requires source...
As mentioned, the Eclipse Public License has a lot in common with other popular weak copyleft licenses like the LGPL and Mozilla Public License 2.0, but there are a handful of notable differences.
As a weak copyleft license, the EPL fills a gap between permissive and strong copyleft licenses. Although the EPL doesn’t rival the MIT or Apache 2.0 Licenses in popularity, several well-known projects are licensed under it. These include: 1. Eclipse’s Jetty Project 2. Eclipse’s Golo Language 3. Clojure (licensed under EPL-1.0) 4. AT&T’s Software T...
The Eclipse Public License (EPL) is a free and open source software license most notably used for the Eclipse IDE and other projects by the Eclipse Foundation. It replaces the Common Public License (CPL) and removes certain terms relating to litigations related to patents .
The Eclipse Public License (EPL) is the software license used by the Eclipse Foundation. It is an open source license.
People also ask
What is Eclipse Public License?
What is the latest version of the Eclipse Public License?
Does the Eclipse Foundation support open source licenses?
Is eclipse code licensed under the EPL?
Apr 7, 2017 · Friday, April 7, 2017 - 14:17 by Mike Milinkovich. The Eclipse Foundation is in the process of revising the Eclipse Public License (EPL). Refreshing a popular open source license is a big job, and one that we have been chipping away at for over a year. The EPL and its predecessor the Common Public License have been around for about 16 years now.
