Yahoo Web Search

  1. About 658,000,000 search results

  1. Nov 2, 2021 · As mentioned, there are four major differences between the original version of the Eclipse Public License (EPL-1.0) and the current EPL-2.0. In contrast to the original, the EPL-2.0 is suitable for scripting languages such as JavaScript, PHP, Python, and Ruby, among others.

  2. Jul 20, 2020 · What is the difference between the Eclipse Public License and the MIT License? MIT is one of the most permissive free software licenses. Basically, you can do whatever you want with a software licensed under the MIT license – only if you add a copy of the original MIT license and copyright notice to it.

  3. People also ask

    What is Eclipse license used for?

    What is the Eclipse Public License (EPL)?

    Is the Eclipse license compatible with the GPL?

    Does the EPL allow me to take the source code?

    • Definitions
    • Grant of Rights
    • Requirements
    • Commercial Distribution
    • No Warranty
    • Disclaimer of Liability
    • General
    • Exhibit A – Form of Secondary Licenses Notice

    “Contribution” means: 1. a) in the case of the initial Contributor, the initial content Distributed under this Agreement, and 2. b) in the case of each subsequent Contributor: 2.1. i) changes to the Program, and 2.2. ii) additions to the Program;where such changes and/or additions to the Program originate from and are Distributed by that particular...

    a) Subject to the terms of this Agreement, each Contributor hereby grants Recipient a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of, publicly di...
    b) Subject to the terms of this Agreement, each Contributor hereby grants Recipient a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free patent license under Licensed Patents to make, use, sell, offer to sell,...
    c) Recipient understands that although each Contributor grants the licenses to its Contributions set forth herein, no assurances are provided by any Contributor that the Program does not infringe t...
    d) Each Contributor represents that to its knowledge it has sufficient copyright rights in its Contribution, if any, to grant the copyright license set forth in this Agreement.

    3.1 If a Contributor Distributes the Program in any form, then: 1. a) the Program must also be made available as Source Code, in accordance with section 3.2, and the Contributor must accompany the Program with a statement that the Source Code for the Program is available under this Agreement, and informs Recipients how to obtain it in a reasonable ...

    Commercial distributors of software may accept certain responsibilities with respect to end users, business partners and the like. While this license is intended to facilitate the commercial use of the Program, the Contributor who includes the Program in a commercial product offering should do so in a manner which does not create potential liabilit...

    EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, AND TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, THE PROGRAM IS PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPO...

    EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, AND TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, NEITHER RECIPIENT NOR ANY CONTRIBUTORS SHALL HAVE ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION LOST PROFITS), HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONT...

    If any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, it shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder of the terms of this Agreement, and without further action by the parties hereto, such provision shall be reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make such provision valid and enforceable. If R...

    “This Source Code may also be made available under the following Secondary Licenses when the conditions for such availability set forth in the Eclipse Public License, v. 2.0 are satisfied: {name license(s), version(s), and exceptions or additional permissions here}.”

  4. Version 2.0 is the latest version of the Eclipse Public License 1.2. What is the SPDX code for the Eclipse Public License, Version 2.0? EPL-2.0 1.3. Why did the Eclipse Foundation create a new version of the EPL? The EPL-1.0 is very close to the Common Public License; and as such, its terms are essentially 16 years old.

  5. The Eclipse Public License ( EPL) is a free and open source software license most notably used for the Eclipse IDE and other projects by the Eclipse Foundation. It replaces the Common Public License (CPL) and removes certain terms relating to litigations related to patents. [6]

    • 2.0
    • EPL-2.0, EPL-1.0
  6. The MPL license is a copyleft license, which means that in principle people are not allowed to distribute code that is under the MPL-2.0 license under different terms. The GPL licenses (including LGPL and AGPL) require that the entire application is distributed under the terms of the GPL license.

  1. People also search for