Yahoo Web Search

  1. About 636,000,000 search results

  1. Eclipse Public License - v 2.0. THE ACCOMPANYING PROGRAM IS PROVIDED UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS ECLIPSE PUBLIC LICENSE (“AGREEMENT”). ANY USE, REPRODUCTION OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE PROGRAM CONSTITUTES RECIPIENT'S ACCEPTANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT. 1. DEFINITIONS. a) in the case of the initial Contributor, the initial content Distributed under this Agreement, and.

    • History of The Eclipse Public License
    • Eclipse Public License: Key Provisions
    • 1.0 vs. Epl-2.0
    • Eclipse Public License vs. Other Weak Copyleft Licenses
    • Eclipse Public License: The Bottom Line

    The original version 1.0 of the Eclipse Public License was based on IBM’s Common Public License (CPL). There were two primary differences between the CPL and EPL-1.0. 1. IBM served as the agreement steward for the CPL, while the Eclipse Foundation is the agreement steward for the EPL 2. The EPL removed the following sentence from the CPL that cover...

    As a weak copyleft license, the EPL is a middle ground of sorts between permissive options (like the MIT License or Apache License 2.0) and strong copyleft licenses (like GPL v2 and GPL v3.) A core requirement of the EPL — one that’s not part of permissive licenses — is that derivative works of EPL-licensed code must also be licensed under the EPL....

    As mentioned, there are four major differences between the original version of the Eclipse Public License (EPL-1.0) and the current EPL-2.0. 1. In contrast to the original, the EPL-2.0 is suitable for scripting languages such as JavaScript, PHP, Python, and Ruby, among others. This is because the EPL-2.0 both defines source code and requires source...

    As mentioned, the Eclipse Public License has a lot in common with other popular weak copyleft licenses like the LGPL and Mozilla Public License 2.0, but there are a handful of notable differences.

    As a weak copyleft license, the EPL fills a gap between permissive and strong copyleft licenses. Although the EPL doesn’t rival the MIT or Apache 2.0 Licenses in popularity, several well-known projects are licensed under it. These include: 1. Eclipse’s Jetty Project 2. Eclipse’s Golo Language 3. Clojure (licensed under EPL-1.0) 4. AT&T’s Software T...

  2. People also ask

    What is the Eclipse Public License?

    Is the Eclipse license compatible with the GPL?

    Does the EPL allow me to take the source code?

    What does EPL-2.0 license mean?

  3. The Eclipse Public License ( EPL) is a free and open source software license most notably used for the Eclipse IDE and other projects by the Eclipse Foundation. It replaces the Common Public License (CPL) and removes certain terms relating to litigations related to patents. [6]

    • 2.0
    • EPL-2.0, EPL-1.0
  4. Jul 20, 2020 · The Eclipse Public License is an open source license developed by the Eclipse Foundation. It’s derived from the Common Public License (CPL). The Eclipse codebase now available under the EPL was formerly licensed under the CPL. Contents hide 1. What are the terms and conditions of the Eclipse Public License? 2. Is it considered a copyleft license?

  5. The MPL license is a copyleft license, which means that in principle people are not allowed to distribute code that is under the MPL-2.0 license under different terms. The GPL licenses (including LGPL and AGPL) require that the entire application is distributed under the terms of the GPL license. In principle, this is incompatible with the MPL ...

  6. Mozilla Public License 2.0 Requirements. Open source software licenses fall into two categories: permissive and copyleft. Copyleft licenses, in turn, come in two flavors: strong and weak. The Mozilla Public License 2.0 is in the latter group. The difference between the two forms of copyleft licenses lies in the scope of source code to be shared.

  1. People also search for