Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. The Eclipse Public License is designed to be a business-friendly free software license, and features weaker copyleft provisions than licenses such as the GNU General Public License (GPL). The receiver of EPL-licensed programs can use, modify, copy and distribute the work and modified versions, in some cases being obligated to release their own ...

    • 2.0
    • EPL-2.0, EPL-1.0
  2. The Eclipse Public License (EPL) is the fundamental license under which Eclipse projects are released. Some projects require dual licensing, for which the Eclipse Distribution License (EDL) is available, although use of this license must be applied for and is considered on a case-by-case basis.

    • 4.29.0, / 13 September 2023 (22 days ago)
  3. People also ask

  4. Konsep Eclipse adalah IDE yang terbuka ( open ), mudah diperluas ( extensible) untuk apa saja, dan tidak untuk sesuatu yang spesifik. [6] Jadi, Eclipse tidak saja untuk mengembangkan program Java, akan tetapi dapat digunakan untuk berbagai macam keperluan, cukup dengan menginstal plug-in yang dibutuhkan. Apabila ingin mengembangkan program C ...

    • 4.12 (2019-06 R), / September 2018; 5 tahun lalu
    • DEFINITIONS. “Contribution” means: a) in the case of the initial Contributor, the initial content Distributed under this Agreement, and. b) in the case of each subsequent Contributor
    • GRANT OF RIGHTS. a) Subject to the terms of this Agreement, each Contributor hereby grants Recipient a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of, publicly display, publicly perform, Distribute and sublicense the Contribution of such Contributor, if any, and such Derivative Works.
    • REQUIREMENTS. 3.1 If a Contributor Distributes the Program in any form, then: a) the Program must also be made available as Source Code, in accordance with section 3.2, and the Contributor must accompany the Program with a statement that the Source Code for the Program is available under this Agreement, and informs Recipients how to obtain it in a reasonable manner on or through a medium customarily used for software exchange; and.
    • COMMERCIAL DISTRIBUTION. Commercial distributors of software may accept certain responsibilities with respect to end users, business partners and the like.
  5. Yes, the EPL-2.0 has been added to the official license list of the Free Software Foundation. While the FSF still considers the EPL-2.0 incompatible with the GPL, it recognizes the EPL-2.0 with Secondary License explicitly offers the option of designating content available under the GNU GPL version 2 or later.

  6. The Eclipse SDK codebase was originally distributed under the CPL. The EPL 1.0 was derived from CPL version 1.0. As a result, much of the information provided in the Common Public License (CPL) Frequently Asked Questions document is relevant to the EPL, as well. The purpose of this FAQ is to highlight the differences.

  7. The Guide to the Legal Documents provides an in-depth look at the many legal documents related to the Eclipse open source community. This content is of value to committers, contributors, redistributors of Eclipse content, developers of Eclipse-based products and users of Eclipse technologies; The Eclipse Public License (EPL) is the default ...

  1. People also search for