Yahoo Web Search

  1. About 1,910 search results
  1. Eric of Pomerania (1381 or 1382 – 24 September 1459) was the ruler of the Kalmar Union from 1396 until 1439, succeeding his grandaunt, Queen Margaret I.He is known as Eric III as King of Norway (1389–1442), Eric VII as King of Denmark (1396–1439) and has been called Eric XIII as King of Sweden (1396–1434, 1436–39), and in his own time was considered an emperor.

    • Portrait
    • Union Arms
    • Duke of Pomerania
    • Eric of Pomerania Crowned in Norway in 1392?
    • Undiscussed Move from Eric of Pomerania
    • Better portrait?
    • Merger Proposal
    • Eric Gryf Listed at Redirects For Discussion

    The caricature is contemporary (I believe the full picture also features a Byzantine Emperor and, if I remember correctly, the Holy Roman Emperor). Do we have any information about the Polish portait and its age? Valentinian (talk) / (contribs)23:57, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

    Twthmoses rightly identifies the three crowns in Eric's union arms as representing the Kalmar Union, and not Sweden. But he objects to the idea that the dividing cross also refers to this union. We will probably never know for sure, but it is very likely 'not' a Dannebrog cross, which would only refer to one of the three kingdoms of this union. The Dannebrog cross appearing in later greater arms of Denmark-Norway is usually shown with fimbriated edges in order to identify it expressly as derived from the flag, with a white cross on a red field. The cross in Eric's union seal is more likely the red cross of the flag that he unsuccessfully tried to adopt for the Kalmar union. That theory has been advocated by the well-known Danish expert on heraldry, Nils G. Bartholdy. See his article:"De tre kroner og korset. Unionssymbolik, ambition og rivalitet", in: Heraldisk tidsskrift, 76 (1997), pp. 233-260. More on the flag of Norden in the FOTW article http://flagspot.net/flags/xn_nordn.html....

    The article says that he was Duke of Stolp/Słupsk from 1449-59. Dukes of Pomerania lists a "Casimir I" as the duke during that time period. Olessi (talk) 20:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

    It seems like there is some evidence for this. I found this while I was making the article on Royal coronations in Norway. Does anyone know more about it? -- Nidator T / C20:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC) 1. Yes. Eldbjørg Haug at the University of Bergen believes she has found evidence for this, and has written an article about it in Historisk Tidsskrift. Some historians have been convinced, others have not. There was a debate about it in Historisk Tidsskriftin the 1990s. At the moment it would be correct to say that this is disputed in the scholarly community, which is more or less what the article says at the moment. 2. Debating the merits of the claim is not for us to do here at wikipedia, of course. But to summarize, from memory, Haug has found a letter written by the King of England to queen Margrethe, where he congratulates her on Erik's recent coronation as King of Norway. The counterargument goes that the English king may in fact have been referring to Erik's hailing as King of Nor...

    Articles are to be located at the most commonly used name - it doesn't matter that other kings are located at their numeric title. Eric of Pomerania is never referred to as Eric 7 but invariably as Eric of Pomerania. This is like moving Gorm the Old to Gorm 1 or Magnus the Pious to Magnus 1st. The article has to be moved back.·Maunus·ƛ·18:53, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 1. That would necessitate moving all the previous Erics (I through VI) to their respective nicknames as they are all commonly referred to as such in Denmark. And before you ask: using the Arabic numeral was a blunder, but I'm waiting for a removal of the present Eric VII redirect to accomplish the "reversal". Favonian (talk) 18:58, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 1.1. And once it's done, there will of course be a redirect "Eric of Pommerania" -> "Eric VII of Denmark". Favonian (talk) 19:01, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 1.1.1. If all the Eriks need to be moved then so be it - they shouldn't be in those locations in the first place. The naming gui...

    I changed the info box portrait to one with better color and more of him visible. Another editor changed it back to the severely cropped version with dull color, giving the opinion that the new one is not better and the question "who wants to see the frame?" I am reverting that, not to make war but to discuss. SergeWoodzing (talk) 07:38, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 1. Personally I don't see much of a difference beside it's brighter and includes more unneeded space and framing. Can you crop this image and remove the frame? In the infobox picture you don't really want to include the frame of the portait. Although I think this argument really depends on one's opinion. --Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 07:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 1.1. I agree. Shall we ask for a Third opinion? SergeWoodzing (talk) 07:54, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

    Cecilia (royal mistress) should be merged into Eric of Pomerania. Cecilia is only notable in the context of being Eric's mistress, so a separate article is unnecessary. Also, there is very little information about her; this information can be merged into Eric's page without causing article size problems. Jenphalian (talk) 02:53, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 1. I say no; many people are notable because of their connection to powerholders, but this form of notability does not mean that they are not notable enough for their own article. The information is already to much to add to the article of Eric. There may also be more to add eventually. --Aciram (talk) 08:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 1. The article is a bit scrappy but I think does just about pass notability. Not everybody who had a brief affair with a king is inherently notable, but we already have several articles on royal mistresses. PatGallacher (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC) 1. 1.1. A connection to a powerful person isn't enough...

    An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eric gryf. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk22:02, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

  2. Bogislaw Erik Kung av Sverige, Norge och Danmark av Pommern (Pommern) aka of Pomerania, of Norway (bef. Jan 1382 - 16 Jun 1459) retrieved.

    • child1 of Pomerania
  3. Euphemia of Pomerania (1285 – 26 July 1330) was Queen of Denmark as the spouse of King Christopher II.She was the daughter of Bogislaw IV, Duke of Pomerania, and his second spouse, Margarete of Rügen.

  4. Cecilia (royal mistress) Cecilia (died after 1459) was a Danish lady-in-waiting at the court of Philippa of England, Queen Consort of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, and later the mistress and morganatic wife of Philippa’s widower King Eric.

  5. Erik af Pommern Links: The Peerage Geneall Kings of Denmark Danmarkshistorien In Danish King of Denmark Reign 1396–1439(de-facto from 1412) Coronation 17. June 1397 in Kalmar View Eric VII of Pomerania, King of Denmark and Norway's genealogy profile; 8/5/2007 12/26/2010 Follow

  6. Kilde: Wikipedia. Sider: 60. Kapitler: Erik Menved, Valdemar Sejr, Christian 2., Erik af Pommern, Saxo Grammaticus, Christoffer af Bayern...

  1. People also search for