Search results
ethical relativism, Philosophical view that what is right or wrong and good or bad is not absolute but variable and relative, depending on the person, circumstances, or social situation. Rather than claiming that an action’s rightness or wrongness can depend on the circumstances, or that people’s beliefs about right and wrong are relative ...
Moral relativism or ethical relativism (often reformulated as relativist ethics or relativist morality) is used to describe several philosophical positions concerned with the differences in moral judgments across different peoples and cultures.
Feb 19, 2004 · The first point is a form of metaethical relativism: It says one morality may be true for one society and a conflicting morality may be true for another society. Hence, there is no one objectively correct morality for all societies. The second point, however, is a concession to moral objectivism.
Feb 2, 2003 · First published Sun Feb 2, 2003. Relativism is not a single doctrine but a family of views whose common theme is that some central aspect of experience, thought, evaluation, or even reality is somehow relative to something else.
Relativism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Relativism is sometimes identified (usually by its critics) as the thesis that all points of view are equally valid. In ethics, this amounts to saying that all moralities are equally good; in epistemology it implies that all beliefs, or belief systems, are equally true.
Oct 23, 2019 · Ethical relativism is a position which takes those examples into account stating that moral principles are relative to different factors and there are no objective values as such nor are there intrinsically right or wrong actions.
Apr 6, 2024 · Quick Reference. The view that the truth of ethical claims is relative to the culture or way of life of those who hold them. It thus generalizes to all of ethics what may reasonably be supposed true of matters of etiquette, summed up in the tag ‘when in Rome, do as the Romans do’.
