Search results
Thus, we conclude that the trial court’s reconsidered decision is timely pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. No. 1930.2(e). -3- J-S78028-17 On July 28, 2017, the trial court sua sponte entered an Order reopening the record of the Motion for Reconsideration to schedule testimony from Mother. Order, 7/28/17.
J-S96029-16 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 M.G. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. S.J. Appellant No. 1182 WDA 2016 Appeal from the Order July 13, 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Civil Division at No(s): FD-07-009307-004 BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., BOWES, J., AND SOLANO, J. MEMORANDUM BY BOWES, J.: FILED JANUARY 30, 2017 S.J. (“Father ...
[J-106-2016] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. MEGAN L. SHINAL AND ROBERT J. SHINAL, HER HUSBAND, : Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court at No. 1714 MDA 2014 dated August 25, 2015, reconsideration denied October 28, 2015, Affirming the Judgment of the Montour County Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division ...
Jan 24, 2019 · Read Heichel v. Marriott Hotel Servs., Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-1981, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database.
Jan 12, 2024 · Standard Pennsylvania Practice 2d (comprehensive "how-to" discussion of PA criminal and civil procedure, including template forms). Goodrich-Amram 2d (discussing the PA rules of civil procedure with notes, citations, commentaries, and over 400 procedural forms). Discovery (providing a framework for discovery rules under PA law).
Mar 2, 2020 · The relevant procedural and factual history of this case is recounted by common pleas in its opinion issued pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 1925(a), Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a), as follows: The instant appeal has its genesis in a request for public records under the Right-to-Know Law[1] (RTKL) . . . filed by [Appellant] with
Such separate civil action was for recovery of damages under Article 2176 of the Civil Code, arising from the same act or omission of the accused. 27 18 DEAN’S CIRCLE 2019 – UST FACULTY OF CIVIL LAW Pursuant to the provision of Rule 111, Section 1, paragraph 3 of the 1985 Rules of Criminal Procedure, when private respondents, as ...
