Search results
Nov 19, 2014 · Civil Case Example. While the lawsuit against McDonald’s made national headlines, the facts of the case regarding negligence, defective product, and breach of implied warranty make a fascinating civil case. Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants CV-93-02419, 1995 (N.M. Dist., Aug. 18, 1994)
Nov 21, 2023 · What are two examples of a civil case? A person injured in a motor vehicle accident sues the driver of the vehicle. An employee sues his employer after falling at work, injuring his leg and...
- A civil court is an institution created by the government to resolve disputes or arguments between two or more people.
- The three most common types of civil cases presented in civil court are: Tort Claims Breach of Contract Landlord/Tenant Issues
- A person injured in a motor vehicle accident sues the driver of the vehicle. An employee sues his employer after falling at work, injuring his leg...
- The Case of Proclamations, 1610
- Entick V Carrington, 1765
- R V Dudley and Stephens, 1884
- Carlill V Carbolic Smoke Ball Co, 1893
- Donoghue and Stevenson, 1932
- Fagan V Metropolitan Police Commissioner, 1969
- R V R, 1991
- The Belmarsh Case, 2004
Over 400 years ago, the chief justice, Sir Edward Coke, ruled thatKing James I could not prohibit new building in London without the support of parliament. King James believed that he had a divine right to make any laws that he wished. But the court opposed his view, and decided that the monarchy could not wield its power in this arbitrary way. By ...
Author and schoolmaster John Entick was suspected of writing a libellous pamphlet against the government. In response, the secretary of state sent Nathan Carrington, along with a group of other king’s men, to search Entick’s house for evidence. Entick then sued the men for trespass. The court decided thatthe secretary of state did not have the lega...
In this case, the survivors of a shipwreck who killed and ate the youngest and weakest crew member were prosecuted for murder. Their defence was based on “necessity” – that they needed to eat the boy, as they were unlikely to survive and the boy probably would have died anyway. It may have been a “custom of the sea”that cannibalism was allowed unde...
Mrs Carlill sued the manufacturerof the carbolic smoke ball – a device for preventing colds and flu – which had promised a reward of £100 for any one catching flu following the use of its product but then refused to pay out. The court decided that this promise, together with Mrs Carlill’s use of the product as directed, amounted to a legally bindin...
In a case originating in Scotland, Mrs Donoghue was given a bottle of ginger beer which allegedly containedthe decomposed remains of a snail. She claimed to have suffered shock and gastroenteritis as a result. But as she had not bought the drink herself, she had no contract on which to sue. Nevertheless, the court extended the lawof negligence to r...
To be guilty of a criminal offence, there often needs to be unlawful act accompanied by a guilty state of mind, such as a criminal intent. So, having accidentally driven his car onto a policeman’s foot, did Mr Fagan commit an assault when he decided not to remove it? Mr Fagan suggested not because he had no criminal intent at the time the car first...
The law is constantly evolving to meet changing social attitudes. In this case, the House of Lords swept away the common law rule that a man could not be guilty of raping his wife. The previous rule was based on a 1736 pronouncement that: The House of Lords ruled thatfor modern times, marriage is a partnership of equals and any other suggestion was...
The Human Rights Act empowered judges to review acts of parliament, to check if they are compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. Using this power, the House of Lords ruled thata statute which allowed terrorist suspects to be detained indefinitely without trial breached the suspects’ human rights. The caseshows how modern courts ask...
- Nicholas Clapham
Sep 11, 2024 · Example case summary. Last modified: 16th Jan 2024. Donoghue v Stevenson, a Scottish dispute, is a famous case in English law which was instrumental in shaping the law of tort and the doctrine of negligence in particular. ...
5 days ago · United States Department of the Interior. Fourth Circuit Holds Congress Stripped Jurisdiction to Hear Pipeline Challenge. Read the latest Recent Case content at Harvard Law Review.
Case law, also known as precedent or common law, is the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending on the relationship between the deciding court and the precedent, case law may be binding or merely persuasive.
People also ask
What is a civil law case?
What are the different types of civil law cases?
What is case law?
What is a legal case brief example?
Aug 15, 2023 · By studying case brief examples, practicing writing your own briefs, and developing a deep understanding of the law in context, you can become a more proficient and effective student and legal professional. For examples, check out LSD's case brief database.
