Search results
2 MORSE v. FREDERICK Syllabus First Amendment by confiscating the pro-drug banner and suspend-ing Frederick. Pp. 5Œ15. (a) Frederick™s argument that this is not a school speech case is re-jected. The event in question occurred during normal school hours and was sanctioned by Morse as an approved social event at which
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. FREDERICK V MORSE. Filing 920060309
6 MORSE v. FREDERICK Opinion of the Court normal school hours. It was sanctioned by Principal Morse fias an approved social event or class trip,fl App. 22Œ 23, and the school district™s rules expressly provide that pupils in fiapproved social events and class trips are sub-ject to district rules for student conduct.fl App. to Pet. for
Oct 21, 2014 · 2. Whether petitioner Morse is entitled to qualified immunity from suit based on her decision to discipline a student for displaying a large banner containing a slang endorsement of marijuana at a school event. In the Supreme Court of the United States. No. 06-278. DEBORAH MORSE, ET AL., PETITIONERS. v. JOSEPH FREDERICK. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Frederick, however, sued Morse and the school board for violating his First Amendment right to Freedom of Speech. Though the District Court agreed with Morse, the Court of Appeals cited Tinker to rule that Frederick’s speech was permitted because he had not caused a disturbance. The Supreme Court disagreed in a 5-4 decision authored by Chief ...
Aug 18, 2023 · Morse v. Frederick, 551 US 393 (2007) Answer Deborah Morse and the Juneau School Board won by a vote of 5-4. The Supreme Court held that the "school speech" doctrine applied, allowing greater ...
Apr 26, 2007 · Issue 104, Spring 2007. For the first time in nearly 20 years, the Supreme Court is poised to address the free speech rights of students. The Court is considering a case, Morse v. Frederick, involving a high school senior from Juneau, Alaska, who was suspended for displaying a banner that his principal did not approve of.