People also ask
What did Friedrich Nietzsche mean with?
What did Nietzsche believe in?
What is simple explanation of Nietzsche's ideas and philosophy?
What were Nietzsche's ideas?
Apr 14, 2012 · Nietzsche ‘s morality is based on the figure of Dionysus, the god of drunkenness, of dance, of spontaneity, of art, of play, of childhood, of body recovery and of creation. More than a list of values, Nietzsche gives the necessary qualities to Superman, including immanence. Indeed, morality is derived more than one beyond, but the man himself.
Christianity and morality In The Antichrist, Nietzsche fights against the way in which Christianity has become an ideology set forth by institutions like churches, and how churches have failed to represent the life of Jesus. Nietzsche finds it important to distinguish between the religion of Christianity and the person of Jesus.
Friedrich Nietzsche developed his philosophy during the late 19th century. He owed the awakening of his philosophical interest to reading Arthur Schopenhauer's Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung (The World as Will and Representation, 1819, revised 1844) and said that Schopenhauer was one of the few thinkers that he respected, dedicating to him his essay Schopenhauer als Erzieher (Schopenhauer ...
In the "slave morality" endorsed by religious establishments, Nietzsche argued, forceful action which should be admired gets labelled as "evil," while the cowardly tendency to think through everything in advance is transformed into the supposed virtue of prudence.
Jan 30, 2017 · Nietzsche foresaw this morality as reigning over the Western world for the foreseeable future, and was to him “the danger of dangers” – a morality in which all individuals, even those with the potential to rise above the mediocre mass, are pressured into becoming
Nietzsche argued that there were two fundamental types of morality: 'Master morality' and 'slave morality'. Slave morality values things like kindness, humility and sympathy, while master morality values pride, strength, and nobility.
Master–slave morality (German: Herren- und Sklavenmoral) is a central theme of Friedrich Nietzsche's works, particularly in the first essay of his book, On the Genealogy of Morality. Nietzsche argued that there were two fundamental types of morality : "master morality" and "slave morality".
- Life and Works
- Critique of Religion and Morality
- Value Creation
- The Self and Self-Fashioning
- Difficulties of Nietzsche’s Philosophical Writing
- Key Doctrines
Nietzsche was born on October 15, 1844, in Röcken (near Leipzig),where his father was a Lutheran minister. His father died in 1849, andthe family relocated to Naumburg, where he grew up in a householdcomprising his mother, grandmother, two aunts, and his younger sister,Elisabeth. Nietzsche had a brilliant school and university career,culminating in May 1869 when he was called to a chair in classicalphilology at Basel. At age 24, he was the youngest ever appointed tothat post. His teacher Frie...
Nietzsche is arguably most famous for his criticisms of traditionalEuropean moral commitments, together with their foundations inChristianity. This critique is very wide-ranging; it aims to underminenot just religious faith or philosophical moral theory, butalso many central aspects of ordinary moral consciousness, some ofwhich are difficult to imagine doing without (e.g., altruisticconcern, guilt for wrongdoing, moral responsibility, the value ofcompassion, the demand for equal consideration...
Unfortunately, neither Nietzsche’s ideas about the nature ofvalue creation nor his suggestions about what specific values shouldbe “created” have seemed as clear to readers as hisnegative critique of traditional values. (The disparity is oftenmarked in the literature by doubts about whether Nietzsche has a“positive” ethics to offer.) There is something to thisreaction: Nietzsche’s critique has a clear target and isdeveloped at an extended scale, whereas his suggestions aboutalternative values...
A probing investigation into the psyche was a leading preoccupationfor Nietzsche throughout his career, and this aspect of his thoughthas rightly been accorded central importance across a long stretch ofthe reception, all the way from Kaufmann (1950) to recent work byPippin (2010), Katsafanas (2016), and others. Some ofNietzsche’s own programmatic reflections highlight thecentrality of this enterprise: perhaps most famously, he closes anextended treatment of the shortcomings of previous philo...
For all the novelty of Nietzsche’s doctrines and the apparentextremity of his criticisms of traditional morality, religion, andphilosophy, perhaps nothing about his work seems more out of step withthe ordinary procedures of philosophy than the way he writes. Thepoint is sufficiently obvious that it has by now become an entirelyconventional trope to begin commentaries with remarks about theunconventional character of Nietzsche’s style. Despitethe attention it gets, however, we continue to lack...
This entry has focused on broad themes pursued throughoutNietzsche’s writing, but much—evenmost—philosophically sophisticated commentary on his work hasbeen devoted to the explication of certain core doctrinal commitments,which Nietzsche seems to rely upon throughout, but which he does notdevelop systematically in his published works in the way typical forphilosophers. Some of these doctrines, like the idea of the eternalrecurrence of the same, are described as “fundamental” byNietzsche himse...