Search results
Feb 6, 2013 · On 02/06/2013 ROBERT GUSTAV ULRICH filed a Family - Marriage Dissolution/Divorce lawsuit against LISA SUZANNE LANGLOIS. This case was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Courts, Stanley Mosk Courthouse located in Los Angeles, California. The Judge overseeing this case is ST. GEORGE, MATTHEW. The case status is Disposed - Dismissed.
- I.
- II.
- A. Property
- B. Free Expression
- Adverse Employment actions.
- Protected expression.
- Substantial Motivating factor.
- Defendants' Burden.
- C. Liberty
- D. Municipal Liability
Dr. Ulrich began working as an attending physician at Laguna Honda Hospital in 1989.In August 1998, he learned that, for budgetary reasons, the San Francisco Department of Health had begun to lay off physicians at the hospital. His own higher pay classification was not affected. At an August 17 staff meeting, chaired by the hospital's Medical Direc...
Dr. Ulrich's § 1983 claims are based on the constitutional admonishment that the government "may not deny a benefit to a person on a basis that infringes his constitutionally protected interests." Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 597, 92 S.Ct. 2694, 33 L.Ed.2d 570(1972). He contends that the defendants denied him benefits associated with continue...
We address first Dr. Ulrich's claim that he was denied adequate notice and a hearing prior to the decision not to accept his rescission of resignation. This claim is based on the Fourteenth Amendment: "No State shall . . . deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1. To prevail, Dr. Ulr...
Dr. Ulrich next claims that the refusal to rescind his resignation and the disciplinary investigation of him were to punish him for speech protected by the First Amendment. To succeed on this claim, it was Dr. Ulrich's initial burden to demonstrate that (1) he was subjected to an adverse employment action, such as being denied a benefit or privileg...
Dr. Ulrich has set forth sufficient facts showing that he was subject to adverse employment actions. To meet this element of a First Amendment retaliation claim, Dr. Ulrich had to demonstrate only that he suffered a loss of any "governmental benefit or privilege" in retaliation for protected speech activity, not that he had a legal right to the ben...
Although the government has "a freer hand in regulating the speech of its employees than it has in regulating the speech of the public at large," Waters v. Churchill, 511 U.S. 661, 671, 114 S.Ct. 1878, 128 L.Ed.2d 686 (1994), public employees do not lose their rights as citizens to participate in public affairs by virtue of their government employm...
The district court did not address whether Dr. Ulrich set forth specific facts showing an unconstitutional motivation for his treatment, but the parties have briefed the issue and we have the record before us. We hold that Dr. Ulrich has presented sufficient evidence that, if accepted by a jury, would meet the causation element of a First Amendment...
Dr. Ulrich met his burden of setting forth sufficient facts demonstrating that he was subjected to an adverse employment action, he engaged in constitutionally protected expression and the protected expression was a substantial motivating factor for the adverse action. The defendants have made no showing under Pickering that their legitimate admini...
We turn to Dr. Ulrich's claim that the failure of the defendants to give him notice and an opportunity to contest the filing of the adverse action reports filed against him deprived him of liberty without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. This claim is rooted in the centuries-old principle that a state may not deprive a p...
Finally, we address whether the district court properly dismissed Dr. Ulrich's claims against the municipal defendants for a failure to set forth specific facts showing a basis for municipal liability. Section 1983 provides a cause of action against any "person" who, under color of law, deprives any other person of rights, privileges, or immunities...
Gustav Ulrich. United States; Follow. Birthdate. 12/28/1962 (61) ... LIV Golf CEO Greg Norman says the league has pulled its application for recognition by the Official World Golf Ranking and will ...
Fax: (801) 475-6548. Monday: 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM: Tuesday: 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM: Wednesday: 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Clark F. Ulrich Financial Advisor Strategic Financial Partners. (801) 627-2100 ext 101 CUlrich@SFP.US. Located at Ulrich & Associates PC, Clark F. Ulrich is a registered representative and investment advisor representative of Securian Financial Services, Inc. Securities and investment advisory services offered through Securian Financial ...
Charles E. Ulrich, CPA Founder (801) 627-2100 ext 110 chuck@ulrichcpa.com. Charles (“Chuck”) Ulrich founded Ulrich & Associates in 1986 and practiced accounting in the Wasatch Front for nearly 40 years before retiring in 2019.
Welcome to Pinotti and Associates, Inc. Pinotti and Associates, Inc. is an accounting and tax firm located in the heart of San Francisco’s North Beach district. Our dedicated staff prides itself on going beyond traditional accounting services. Pinotti and Associates provides comprehensive tax preparation services and solutions in the areas of ...
