Search results
- Japan is for sure not a stranger to earthquakes; such high level of earthquake activity in Japan has significantly impacted various aspects of the life of its citizens including domestic economy, environment and social communities.
storymaps.arcgis.com › stories › 77f0f0fbf1ee48fe9200f4bc72bcd1a4Living Along the Ring of Fire - 2011 Tohoku Earthquake, Japan
People also ask
What happened 3 days after a major earthquake in Japan?
Does Japan take earthquake safety seriously?
How dangerous is a Japan earthquake?
Are old Japanese buildings prone to earthquakes?
Jan 2, 2024 · Reuters. A powerful earthquake on New Year's Day 2024 toppled houses in central Japan. By Rupert Wingfield-Hayes. Former BBC Tokyo correspondent. It's been nearly 13 years since the devastating...
- 3 min
- Rupert Wingfield
Jan 5, 2024 · Three days after a major earthquake shook the West Coast of Japan, a difficult search for survivors is still underway. The magnitude-7.6 earthquake off the coast of the Noto Peninsula produced the strongest shaking the region had experienced in decades, triggering a tsunami evacuation order for nearly 100,000 people.
Jan 5, 2024 · Science. Japan takes earthquake safety seriously. Here's how its culture of preparedness keeps so many people alive. Jenny McGrath and Morgan McFall-Johnsen. Jan 5, 2024, 2:26 PM PST. A 2024...
Jan 2, 2024 · Asia. Teams in Japan assess the impact of earthquakes and powerful aftershocks. January 2, 20247:17 AM ET. Heard on Morning Edition. Anthony Kuhn. 2-Minute Listen. Playlist. Japan's west...
- Overview
- Adapting to major earthquakes
- Designing for shaking
The country has earned a reputation as one of the most disaster-ready nations in the world due to its seismic codes and culture of preparedness, much of which was built on knowledge from previous disasters.
The Tokyo Skytree, one of the capital city's most recognizable skyscrapers, has been built to withstand even major earthquakes.
Three days after a major earthquake shook the West Coast of Japan, a difficult search for survivors is still underway. The magnitude-7.6 earthquake off the coast of the Noto Peninsula produced the strongest shaking the region had experienced in decades, triggering a tsunami evacuation order for nearly 100,000 people. While the damage assessments are still trickling in, early reports estimate hundreds of houses were destroyed by the quake and subsequent fires, and more than 80 deaths have been confirmed so far.
But seismologist Lucy Jones believes the intensity and offshore location of this earthquake could have produced significantly more devastation had the nation been less prepared. On X, Jones praised Japan’s “strong, enforced building codes,” which she says resulted in the damage being “much less than it could have been.”
Understanding how to best prepare for major earthquakes is often hard-won, stemming from knowledge gleaned from past disasters, says Keith Porter, chief engineer for Canada’s Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction. In Japan, seismic regulations for building codes were first introduced after a magnitude-7.9 earthquake in 1923 killed more than 140,000 people and reduced hundreds of thousands of structures to rubble. These early regulations were focused on strengthening new structures being built in urban areas, adding oversight to the construction of wood and concrete buildings.
The seismic code has undergone a number of significant changes in the decades since, most notably through the Building Standard Law of 1950 and the New Earthquake Resistant Building Standards Amendment in 1981. Along with providing construction specifics, these pieces of legislation established expectations for how buildings are expected to perform during earthquakes. The 1950 Act established a standard in which buildings were expected to withstand earthquakes up to a magnitude-7 without serious issue. The 1981 Amendment gets a bit more specific with what that damage can be, stating that when earthquakes up to a magnitude-7 strike, a building should only sustain minor damage but still function as usual. For stronger earthquakes, Japanese law says the building should simply not collapse.
There are a number of different techniques that achieve these standards in Japan, with the choice of which to use often depending on the type of structure—such as a skyscraper or single-family home—and the budget available, along with other considerations. At a base level, buildings are fortified with thicker beams, pillars, and walls to better withstand shaking.
There are also techniques to help separate buildings from the movement of a shaking ground. One popular method is installing pads made of absorbent material like rubber at the base of a building’s foundation, dampening the shock of movement to the structure itself. Another approach, the base isolation system, calls for not just having these pads at the base, but building the entire structure atop thick padding so that there is a full layer of separation between the unit and the moving earth.
Porter notes that many older Japanese buildings are traditional post and beam wood frame construction, which “tends to be very fragile” and vulnerable to earthquake damage. Following another deadly earthquake in 1995, Japan began focusing on retrofitting older architecture to be more resilient to earthquakes.
Of course, none of this is foolproof. Specific challenges arise depending on the location of a building, such as if it is in a liquefaction zone, in which the ground can no longer support the weight of structures. And then there are the secondary consequences that often follow major earthquakes, such as fires igniting or tsunami damage.
That’s why building safety is just one part of Japan’s approach to earthquake resiliency.
Following the New Year’s Day earthquake, University of Tokyo professor Toshitaka Katada told the Associated Press he believes there are “probably no people on Earth who are as disaster-ready as the Japanese” given the preparedness measures that are considered routine in the country, like evacuation planning and drills. Evacuation centers, often schools or other community gathering spaces, are equipped with emergency supplies, and residents are told to have emergency supplies available at their homes, as well. The country also has a robust warning system, which was triggered for both this week’s earthquake and tsunami threat.
Supply Chain and Transport. Follow. An earthquake in Japan’s Noto Peninsula on 1 January 2024 led to 245 deaths, 76,144 damaged housing units and significant displacement; the severity of the aftermath was compounded by the region’s unique traits.
Japan doesn't report earthquakes by magnitude. It reports how much the ground shakes. The scale goes from 1 to 7. ... In the large cities of Toyama and Kanazawa, life is already returning to some ...
