Search results
Indo-Uralic. In historical linguistics, Italo-Celtic is a hypothetical grouping of the Italic and Celtic branches of the Indo-European language family on the basis of features shared by these two branches and no others. There is controversy about the causes of these similarities.
Phrygian provides in several respects the missing link between Greek and Armenian. In particular, the paradigms of the middle voice appear to have been more extensive than what we find in the separate languages. The archaic character of the Phrygian language is corroborated by the Indo-Iranian and Italo-Celtic evidence.
They are probably more closely related to each other than to any other IE branch, both originating in a Western-Central European dialectal area. So I think it's plausible to speak of an Italo-Celtic subgroup within the IE family. It would be very old though and it would have included other, long extinct languages besides Celtic and Italic.
Listening to your PDF documents hands-free is simple with ReadLoudly. Here's how to get started: Select the PDF document you want to listen to. Our website allows you to easily upload and select the PDF document you want to listen to. Once the PDF is loaded, navigate to the page you want to listen to. Our intuitive interface allows you to ...
Italo-Celtic. v. t. e. In historical linguistics, Italo-Celtic is a grouping of the Italic and Celtic branches of the Indo-European language family on the basis of features shared by these two branches and no others. These are usually considered to be innovations, which are likely to have developed after the breakup of Proto-Indo-European.
t. e. Paleo-Balkan peoples and their respective languages in Eastern Europe and Anatolia between 5th and 1st century BC. The Armeno-Phrygians are a hypothetical people of West Asia (specifically of Asia Minor and the Armenian Highlands) during the Bronze Age, the Bronze Age collapse, and its aftermath. They would be the common ancestors of both ...
Phrygian provides in several respects the missing link between Greek and Armenian. In particular, the paradigms of the middle voice appear to have been more extensive than what we find in the separate languages. The archaic character of the Phrygian language is corroborated by the Indo-Iranian and Italo-Celtic evidence.
