Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. The Phrygian language was the Indo-European language of the Phrygians, spoken in Anatolia , during classical antiquity . Phrygian ethno-linguistic homogeneity is debatable. Ancient Greek authors used "Phrygian" as an umbrella term to describe a vast ethno-cultural complex located mainly in the central areas of Anatolia rather than a name of a single "tribe" or "people". Because of the ...

  2. Indo-Uralic. In historical linguistics, Italo-Celtic is a hypothetical grouping of the Italic and Celtic branches of the Indo-European language family on the basis of features shared by these two branches and no others. There is controversy about the causes of these similarities.

  3. View PDF. The Indo-European k-aorist. Frederik Kortlandt. The k-aorist originated from a common development of Italic, Greek, Phrygian, Balto-Slavic, Indo-Iranian and Tocharian and may not be dated later than non-Anatolian Indo-European. The k-perfect developed from the resultative interpretation of the k-aorist.

  4. Available for iOS, Android, and desktop. Send unlimited free texts and make WiFi calls from a free phone number. Download the free app or sign up online to pick your free phone number.

  5. I believe in Italo-Celtic, and a grouping above that containing Italo-Celtic, Helleno-Phrygian, and Germanic. Also, a grouping of Balto-Slavic, Indo-Iranic, Armenian, and maybe Albanian. I think Albanian might actually be its own thing though, as in some instances it actually retains the original ḱ k kʷ distinction according to Wikipedia's ...

  6. Italo-Celtic. v. t. e. In historical linguistics, Italo-Celtic is a grouping of the Italic and Celtic branches of the Indo-European language family on the basis of features shared by these two branches and no others. These are usually considered to be innovations, which are likely to have developed after the breakup of Proto-Indo-European.