Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. This is an extended version of a chapter devoted to the position of the Phrygian language within the IndoEuropean by Obrador-Cursach (2020: 121–127). A first draft of this paper was presented to the 6th “‘Luwic’ Dialects: Inheritance and diffusion” Workshop, held in Barcelona (March 28, 2019).

    • Bartomeu Obrador-Cursach
  2. 7.1 Introduction. Many scholars have noted similarities between Italic ( Chapter 8) and Celtic ( Chapter 9 ). Schleicher (1858) was the first to posit an Italo-Celtic node between Proto-Indo-European and Celtic and Italic. 1 But in the 1920s Carl Marstrander and Giacomo Devoto questioned the validity of this subgrouping. 2 Scholarly opinion has ...

  3. People also ask

  4. An alternative theory, suggested by Eric P. Hamp, is that Phrygian was most closely related to Italo-Celtic languages. Inscriptions. The Phrygian epigraphical material is divided into two distinct subcorpora, Old Phrygian and New Phrygian. These attest different stages of the Phrygian language, are written with different alphabets and upon ...

    • After the 5th century AD
  5. The archaic character of the Phrygian language is corroborated by the Indo-Iranian and Italo-Celtic evidence. Download Free PDF View PDF Journal of Language Relationship

    • Orsat Ligorio, Alexander Lubotsky
  6. 9.2 Evidence for the Celtic Branch . When listing the defining innovations of Proto-Celtic, we quickly encounter a problem closely linked to the poor attestation of the Continental Celtic languages: many of the most distinct innovatory features differentiating Celtic from the other Indo-European branches can strictly speaking only be proven to be “Proto-Goidelo-Brittonic”, and it is ...

  7. Phrygian belongs to the centum group of IE languages (Ligorio and Lubotsky 2018: 1824). Together with Greek, Celtic, Italic, Germanic, Hittite and Tocharian, Phrygian merged the old palatovelars with plain velars in a first step: NPhr.

  1. People also search for