Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. People also ask

   How did the Indian Removal Act affect the Indians?

   • The passage of the Indian Removal Act (see Document 7) led eventually to the relocation of Indians to the western territories. Some Indians sold their land and moved voluntarily; others resisted removal.

   Indian Removal | Teaching American History

   teachingamericanhistory.org/document/indian-removal/

   See all results for this question

   Was the Removal Act a benevolent empire of reform-minded Protestants?

   • The appeal was unavailing. The Removal Act passed, despite the opposition of Christian missionaries to the Indians and their numerous supporters among what has been called the benevolent empire of reform-minded American Protestants.

   Indian Removal | Teaching American History

   teachingamericanhistory.org/document/indian-removal/

   See all results for this question

   Do treaties with Indians restrain state legislation?

   • The passage of this act is certainly understood by the representatives of Georgia as abandoning us to the oppressive and cruel measures of the state, and is sustaining the opinion that treaties with Indians do not restrain state legislation. . . .

   Indian Removal | Teaching American History

   teachingamericanhistory.org/document/indian-removal/

   See all results for this question

   Why did the Cherokee resist removal?

   • Ross and the majority of Cherokees continued to resist removal, despite the act and the Echota Treaty; whites’ hunger for Indian land was too great, especially after the discovery of gold in Cherokee territory in 1828. Pressure for land and disregard for the Indians led to forced removal and all the evils that Ross foretold in his appeal.

   Indian Removal | Teaching American History

   teachingamericanhistory.org/document/indian-removal/

   See all results for this question

2. teachingamericanhistory.org › document › indian-removalIndian Removal | Teaching American History

   teachingamericanhistory.org › document › indian-removal

   • Cached

   3 days ago · The order reflects the character of the Indian Removal Act, which made it lawful for the president to protect the emigrating tribes and provide them necessary and proper aid and comfort.

3. australian.nativetribe.info › trail-of-tearsTrail of Tears: Unraveling the Indian Removal Act of 1830

   australian.nativetribe.info › trail-of-tears

   • Cached

   4 days ago · The legacy of the Indian Removal Act continues to shape contemporary debates about Native American rights, land claims, and cultural preservation. It serves as a call for reconciliation and a commitment to building a more just and equitable future for all Americans. FAQs. What was the main purpose of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?

4. Videos

   • 

     2:40

     youtube.com

     28th May 1830: The Indian Removal Act signed into law by President Andrew Jackson

     May 27, 2021

     33.8K Views

   • 

     5:21

     youtube.com

     The Indian Removal Act Explained in 5 Minutes: US History Review

     Dec 16, 2014

     376.6K Views

   • 

     2:29

     youtube.com

     Trail of Tears: Andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Act of 1830

     Sep 18, 2020

     23.2K Views

   View all

5. www.chicagotribune.com › 2024/05/06 › for-prairieFor Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation, federal recognition at last

   www.chicagotribune.com › 2024/05/06 › for-prairie

   • Cached

   5 days ago · The Indian Removal Act in 1830 eventually drove all tribes in the region west of the Mississippi, including the Potawatomi. Prairie Band purchased a reservation in Kansas, where most of its...

6. www.reddit.com › r › PresidentsCan someone explain how Indian Removal violated ... - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › r › Presidents

   • Cached

   Discussion. To preface the Indian Removal act was wrong in every possible way and by modern standards is probably genocide or at the very least ethnic cleansing, this is purely about wether Jackson’s actions were in violation of the Worcester vs Georgia decision. In my understanding of the decision it ruled the state of Georgia did not have ...

7. makinghistorycomealive.substack.com › p › makingMaking History Come Alive Offers the Trail of Tears

   makinghistorycomealive.substack.com › p › making

   5 days ago · Thanks for reading Making History Come Alive! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. Subscribed. Although the treaty mandated the removal of “all white people who have intruded, or may hereafter intrude, on the lands of the Cherokees,” the United States instead forcibly removed more than 15,000 Cherokees in 1838 and 1839.

8. www.youtube.com › watchA Dark Chapter in American history | A Story of resilience ...

   www.youtube.com › watch

   • Cached

   5 days ago · "The Trail of Tears was a brutal and devastating chapter in American history, where tens of thousands of Native Americans were forcibly relocated from their ...

   • Video Duration: 1 min

   • Author: @Magic Finger

9. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Martin_Van_BurenMartin Van Buren - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Martin_Van_Buren

   • Cached

   2 days ago · Indian removal. Federal policy under Jackson had sought to move Indian tribes to lands west of the Mississippi River through the Indian Removal Act of 1830, and the federal government negotiated 19 treaties with Indian tribes during Van Buren's presidency.