Yahoo Web Search

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs. Intel Core i9-9900K: Which High-End CPU ...

    www.pcmag.com/comparisons/amd-ryzen-9-3900x-vs...

    Oct 18, 2019 · With the arrival of the first Ryzen 9 processors this year, AMD expanded its ability to rival the performance of competing chips from Intel. If you're in the market for the ultimate...

  2. Nov 22, 2019 · Intel’s top processor in the i9 family is its 10th generation Intel Core i9 Extreme Edition processor. This processor has 18 Core with hyperthreading up to 36 threads and can produce clock speed of up to 5GHz. The core counts are lesser than AMD Ryzen processors but when it comes to clock speed Intel is much better than AMD processors.

  3. UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs Intel Core i9-9900K

    cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i9...

    This is AMD’s first Ryzen 9 processor and it is a 12-core, 24-thread CPU based on their latest 7nm Zen 2 microarchitecture. The 3900X has a boost/base clock of 3.8/4.6 GHz, 64 MB of L3 cache (double the L3 on the rest of 3000 series), support for 3200 MHz DDR4 system memory and a TDP of 105W.

  4. UserBenchmark: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X vs Intel Core i9-10900K

    cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i9...

    Based on 24,099 user benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X and the Intel Core i9-10900K, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,263 CPUs.

  5. AMD Ryzen 9 3950X vs Intel Core i9-9900K: The Battle for ...

    www.tomshardware.com/features/amd-ryzen-9-3950x...

    Dec 24, 2019 · In the Cinebench R20 tests, our Ryzen 9 3950X was bested only by AMD’s 32-core Threadripper 2990WX and an overclocked 18-core Core i9-9980XE in the multi-threaded test. Intel’s Core i9-9900K @ 5.0...

  6. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs. Intel Core i9-9900K | Spec Comparison ...

    www.digitaltrends.com/computing/amd-ryzen-9...
    • by The Numbers
    • Gaming
    • Productivity
    • Efficiency
    • The 3900X Is The New CPU King

    Only eclipsed by its 16-core brethren, the Ryzen 9 3900X is the most powerful mainstream CPU AMD has ever released, and it has some fantastically powerful specifications. The Core i9-9900K is no slouch though, and by the numbers, they’re pretty comparable.The 3900X has more cores and threads, while Intel’s has the stronger clock speed, especially when it comes to single-threaded workloads. Most games utilize a handful of cores in 2019, though, so unless you’re overclocking, you won’t typicall...

    Intel has held a performance edge in gaming for more than a decade, and even with AMD’s fantastic first- and second-generation Ryzen CPUs, that held true. But no longer. In our gaming tests with Fortnite, Civilization VI, and Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, the 3900X beat out the 9900K — a CPU previously hailed as the best gaming chip ever made — on almost all settings, showing a slight lead. That might not be the crushing numbers that AMD fans hoped for, but this is the first time that a high-end...

    Heavily multi-threaded productivity tasks like video transcoding and editing have been more AMD’s wheelhouse for the past couple of years, with its Ryzen and Threadripper chips competing directly and even pulling ahead of Intel’s more expensive options. With the 3000 series, and specifically the 12-core, 24-thread 3900X, AMD has beaten not only Intel’s mainstream chips (the 9900K included) but will even put some of its older Threadripper cousins out to pasture.At E3 AMD showed off statistics...

    Efficiency isn’t as important on desktop chips as it with mobile, as there’s no battery life to be concerned with. That said, heat is an important factor and the more power a CPU requires, the more heat it outputs. That’s where the somewhat marketing-driven TDP figure comes from.By the numbers, Intel’s 9900K is the more efficient chip, with a rated TDP of 95 watts, while the 3900X has a TDP of 105 watts. But that’s not the full story. Intel’s TDP ratings tend to relate to its base clock, rath...

    We were excited for the 3900X before it launched based on prerelease numbers and speculation and we’re happy to report that post launch, after having tested it, we’re even happier. The 3900X offers comparable performance to the 9900K in gaming and limited thread tasks, even eclipsing it in some cases, and it obliterates it in multithreaded workloads. It does so at a comparable price and a lower TDP, meaning it draws less power and requires less cooling for its highest performance.The 3900X is...

    • Jon Martindale
  7. People also ask

    Which CPU should I buy, an AMD or an Intel?

    Why is Intel better than AMD?

    What's the difference between Ryzen and Intel?

    Do you use Intel or AMD?

  8. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs Intel Core i9-9900K: Which CPU Is Better ...

    www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-9_3900x...

    Jul 12, 2019 · If we overclock the i9-9900K to 5GHz and enable PBO on the Ryzen 9 3900X, the Intel CPU now uses more power at 175W versus the AMD at 168W. Image 1 of 7 Image 2 of 7

    • Joe Shields
  9. AMD Threadripper vs Intel Core i9: The best CPUs do battle ...

    www.pcworld.com/article/3198476/amd-threadripper...

    A summary of AMD Ryzen Threadripper and Intel Core i9 specifications, including the price at the time of writing. Spec-for-spec, AMD earns the advantage on price, with its Threadripper chips...

  10. AMD vs Intel 2020: Who Makes the Best CPUs? | Tom's Hardware

    www.tomshardware.com/features/amd-vs-intel-cpus

    Intel's 10-core 20-thread Core i9-10900K pales in comparison, but based on pricing, it actually battles AMD's Ryzen 9 3900X. Here we see that AMD has both the core count and price-per-core ...

    • Paul Alcorn
  11. Intel Core vs. AMD Ryzen: Which offers the best value | PCWorld

    www.pcworld.com/article/3403018/intel-core-vs...

    Jun 18, 2019 · Unlike AMD, Intel doesn’t seem to care to lower its value per thread. The closest Intel CPU is an 8-core Core i9-9900 for $27 per thread. It’s a low-wattage 65-watt chip, though, so it gives up...