Yahoo Web Search

  1. About 400,000 search results
  1. Murray, Williamson and Allan R. Millett, eds. Military Innovation in the Interwar Period (1998) Newman, Sarah, and Matt Houlbrook, eds. The Press and Popular Culture in Interwar Europe (2015) Overy, R.J. The Inter-War Crisis 1919–1939 (2nd ed. 2007) Rothschild, Joseph. East Central Europe between the two world wars (U of Washington Press, 2017).

    • Page Organisation
    • Editorializing?
    • Dalism by 212.85.28.237
    • Hmm. Interbellum
    • More Info..
    • Spanish Civil War
    • Intrawar
    • About Finland
    • Other Interwar Periods/Events
    • Very Poor Article

    I don't understand why there's links to a bunch of history articles? -b01:29, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Changed the opening to refer to the period as between wars, being WWI and WWII. Since WWI started in Europe and WWII started in several places, but also in Europe, the context is that between 2 wars can only refer to the European theatre and thus the years 1918 to 1939. I removed wording as it being known as the period between the wars as the title is obvious, which doen not go for the word interbellumPrudentia (talk) —Preceding undatedcomment added 05:20, 3 October 2011 (UTC).

    "The idea behind the creation of the League was a good idea because its primary aims still remain important in today’s society however it was badly administered." I'm not promotign debate on whether or not the ideas behind the League of Nations were good or not, but rather pointing out that such editorializations do not belong on Wikipedia. Could be rephrased to: "Though the League of Nations was continually undermined and ultimately dissolved, many of the original goals of the League are still pursued by the United Nations, the spiritual successor of the League of Nations." Not only does it remove the editorializing, it also provides needed reference to the comparison between the League and the UN. 67.160.175.115 (talk) 05:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Mic check —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.95.94.145 (talk) 16:10, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

    Can someone revert this article to it's previous version, as it shows clear signs of vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.7.8.219 (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC).

    just a thought, but shouldn't that be interbella? (generally, words ending in -um have a plural ending in -aand interbellum means between the wars, which is plural.) is there an established grammatical consensus that it is indeed interbellum? Maybe Bellum is being used in a more abstract, all inclusive fashion to mean warfare in general, so by being between two world wars, the Interbellum period is between periods of war, hence Inter-Bellum. D Boland (talk) 01:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC) Is it anything to do with the case of "bellum"?Also - is it just american english - i'm sure i've seen it referred to as interbellum in (english) history books194.209.8.142 (talk) 13:10, 28 May 2008 (UTC) ~~Interbellum is Latin, so it can be used in English regardless of dialect. In fact, I'm removing that reference, because it is unverified that it is exclusively used in "American English". As a speaker of British English I can tell you that it is certainly used in Commonwealth nations. —Preceding unsig...

    The interbella was a time of great social change. This is crucial and should be included. yeee —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.104.127 (talk) 14:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

    The Spanish Civil War was one of the most important events in the period and it isn't even mentioned in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.227.58.98 (talk) 06:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 1. 1.1. Good Point. this war has been added, Rjensen (talk) 07:34, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

    I don't think it's important to include a distinction of "interwar period" from the infrequently used "intrawar" in this article. In any case, surely the lead is not where to put it. Per the nutshell statement at WP:LEAD, "The lead should define the topic and summarize the body of the article with appropriate weight." Since the brief mention of "intrawar" is never addressed again, I'm going to remove it, on second thought. Here is the last version of the text I am removing: In contrast to the interwar period, historians refer to the time of the First World War (1914–1918) and the Second World War (1939-1945) as "intrawar" periods.[citation needed] -Phoenixrod (talk) 05:43, 2 October 2010 (UTC) 1. This is standard disambiguation (but for not having its own topic): "intrawar" is most commonly a typo. I am also of opinion that all dictionary words should link to topics (if not to Wiktionary). But this is a continuation of a faraway conflict, as a third party says. I could stub "intrawa...

    I would add a link about Heimosodat to Finland section because it was pretty important part of Finnish Interwar period. --Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 15:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

    This list seems like OR to me. Any period between wars could be so called, but I think that to avoid WP:INDISCRIMINATE and OR this list should only contain common usage as verified in reliable sources of the term "interbellum" or "inter-war period" to describe periods between wars. -- PBS (talk) 11:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC) 1. 1.1. This article should be renamed, because while it's true that "inter-war period" may refer to any period between two wars, the Interwar is the one between 1918 and 1939. walk victor falktalk14:20, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

    For god sake, "interwar period" is just a convenient expression to denote the 20-year period between the two WWs. It's ridiculous to attempt to summarize, as this overlinked, high-school entry level article attempt to do, some political events that have occurred during those twenty years because then even a summary of political events would be at least 10 times the length of this article. And then, why limit oneself to political eventsas it is done here? The expression "Interwar period" is used just as much, if not more so, in non-political contexts ("French cinema in the interwar period", "The decorative arts during the interwar period", etc.). IMO, a broad definition of the expression would have been sufficient (avoiding pedantic references to the "Treaty of Versailles" and the "Invasion of Poland" etc. because "end of World War I" and "beginning of World War II would have been quite sufficient)..--Lubiesque (talk) 16:26, 14 December 2014 (UTC) 1. Yup. This article would serve its...

  2. Monty G. Marshall,Ted Gurr, Keith Jaggers, The Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2012 – Dataset Users’ Manual, s.l. 2017, available here Jørgen Møller, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Mapping Political Regime Developments in Interwar Europe: A Multidimensional Approach [paper delivered at ECPR session ...

  3. America First refers to a policy stance in the United States that generally emphasizes nationalism and non-interventionism. The isolationist approach gained prominence in the interwar period (1918–1939) and was advocated by the America First Committee, a non-interventionist pressure group against the U.S. entry into World War II.

  4. People also ask

    When did the interwar period take place?

    What does interwar mean?

    When are the interwar years in Europe?

  5. Between 1929 and 1933, the gross national product dropped 40% (compared to 37% in the US). Unemployment reached 27% at the depth of the Depression in 1933. Many businesses closed, as corporate profits of $396 million in 1929 turned into losses of $98 million in 1933. Canadian exports shrank by 50% from 1929 to 1933.

    • Small Arms
    • Artillery
    • Armoured Fighting Vehicles

    Pistols

    1. ČZ 24 as it is known commercially. It is designated by Czechoslovak military as Vz 24. Standard Czechoslovak interwar pistolPistole vz. 22 2. Pistole vz. 24 3. ČZ vz. 27 4. ČZ vz. 38

    Rifles

    1. Gewehr 98 inspired Czechoslovak Vz 24 rifle. Standard Czechoslovak army rifle for most of the interwar periodVz. 98/22 2. Vz. 24 3. Vz. 33 4. Czechoslovak ZH-29 one of the first semi-auto rifles in the world.ZH-29

    Submachine guns

    1. Bulgarian soldier using Czechoslovak ZK-383 submachine gun with bipod deployed. Started production in 1938 just before occupation. Bipod added as was intended to be used as a squad automatic weapon like a Bren gun or DP28ZK-383 2. KP vz. 38

    Tank and Anti-tank guns

    1. Skoda 3,7 cm KPÚV vz 37 interwar Czechoslovak anti-tank gun3,7cm KPÚV vz. 34(main armament of Czechoslovak tank LT vz 34 and LT vz 35 the latter AKA Panzer 35(t)) 2. 4cm kanón vz. 36 3. 3,7cm KPÚV vz. 37 4. 3,7cm ÚV vz. 38(main armament of Czechoslovak LT vz 38 tank AKA Panzer 38(t)) 5. 4,7cm KPÚV vz. 38(gun of Panzerjager I)

    Field guns and Mountain guns

    1. Skoda 75 mm Model 1928 2. Skoda 75 mm Model 1936 3. Skoda 75 mm Model 1939 4. 8 cm kanon vz. 28 5. 8 cm kanon vz. 30 6. Skoda houfnice vz 14 7. Skoda 100 mm Model 16/19 8. 10 cm houfnice vz. 28 9. 10 cm houfnice vz. 30 (howitzer) 10. 10.5 cm hruby kanon vz. 35 11. Skoda 105 mm Model 1939

    Heavy artillery

    1. 15 cm hrubá houfnice vz. 25 2. Skoda K series 3. Skoda Model 1928 Gun 4. 21 cm Mörser M. 16/18 5. 21 cm Kanone 39 6. 210 mm gun M1939 (Br-17) 7. Skoda 220 mm howitzer 8. 24 cm Haubitze 39 9. 305 mm howitzer M1939 (Br-18)

    Tanks

    1. LT vz 38 Czechoslovak light tank. German designation Panzer38(t),. Most famous Czechoslovak interwar weapon after being popularised by use by Nazi Germany in early World War II (Polish campaign to start of operation Barbarossa). This tank also saw use in other countries as well as the previous LT vz 35 light tank.Kolohousenka 2. LT vz. 34 3. LT vz 35 (Panzer 35(t)) 4. LT vz 38(Panzer 38(t)) 5. ST vz 39(commercial designation V-8-H)

    Tankettes

    1. Tančík vz 33 Tankette in service with Czechoslovak military in inter-war period.Tančík vz. 33 2. Škoda MU-4 3. AH-IV

    Armoured cars

    1. Replica OA vz 30 in Czechoslovak vehicle camouflage is which can be seen in previous Czechoslovak AFV images. Armoured car of Czechoslovak armed forces in inter-war period.OA vz. 27 2. OA vz. 30

  1. People also search for