Search results
Superman III. "Superman III" is the kind of movie I feared the original "Superman" would be. It's a cinematic comic book, shallow, silly, filled with stunts and action, without much human interest. What's amazing is that the first two Superman movies avoided that description, creating a fantasy with a certain charm.
Jun 4, 2023 · "Pryor can be a wicked, anarchic comic actor, and that presence would have been welcome here," wrote film critic Roger Ebert. "Instead, like the rest of 'Superman III,' he's kind of...
Feb 20, 2024 · As Roger Ebert wrote in his original review, Superman III is “a cinematic comic book, shallow, silly, filled with stunts and action, without much human interest.” Superman III was one...
- Alex Welch
People also ask
Is Roger Ebert a 'Superman 3' critic?
Is Superman 3 a good movie?
Is Superman a good movie?
Is Superman a comedy?
No half measures for Superman. The movie is, in fact, a triumph of imagination over both the difficulties of technology and the inhibitions of money. Superman wasn't easy to bring to the screen, but the filmmakers kept at it until they had it right.
Nov 4, 2010 · The first time we see Superman in his red, blue and yellow uniform is nearly an hour into "Superman." Perhaps the filmmakers agreed with Spielberg's famous statement that "Jaws" would work better the longer he kept the shark off the screen. That means the film doesn't open like most superhero movies or James Bonds with a sensational pre-title sequence. To be sure, it opens on the planet ...
63. Chicago Sun-Times Roger Ebert. Superman III is the kind of movie I feared the original "Superman" would be. It's a cinematic comic book, shallow, silly, filled with stunts and action, without much human interest. 60. Time Out.
Dec 21, 2022 · 11. Superman IV: The Quest for Peace — Easily the worst of the list and among the worst superhero films, with a terrible villain, terrible dialogue, excessive camp, and lousy VFX. But ...
