Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. • • The Birth of a Nation overpowers its narrative flaws and uneven execution through sheer conviction, rising on Nate Parker's assured direction and the strength of its vital message.
     www.rottentomatoes.com › m › the_birth_of_a_nation_2016

     The Birth of a Nation | Rotten Tomatoes

2. People also ask

   Is 'the birth of a nation' still a good movie?

   • A century after its release, “The Birth of a Nation” still impresses with its technical artistry, and appalls with its racism and nativism. Courtesy Everett A hundred years ago, on February 8, 1915, D. W. Griffith released “The Birth of a Nation.” The movie became the fledgling film industry’s first blockbuster.

   A Hundred Years Later, “The Birth of a Nation” Hasn’t Gone Away

   www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/hundred-years-later-birth-nation-hasnt-gone-away

   See all results for this question

   How long is 'the birth of a Nation' rated?

   • “The Birth of a Nation” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). Violence begets violence. Running time: 2 hours. An earlier version of this review misidentified the actress who plays Nat Turner’s wife and misstated the wife’s name. She is played by Aja Naomi King, not Aunjanue Ellis, and her name is Cherry, not Nancy.

   Review: In Nate Parker’s ‘The Birth of a Nation,’ Must-See and Won’t

   www.nytimes.com/2016/10/07/movies/the-birth-of-a-nation-review-nate-parker.html

   See all results for this question

   When was the birth of a nation made?

   • Courtesy Everett A hundred years ago, on February 8, 1915, D. W. Griffith released “The Birth of a Nation.” The movie became the fledgling film industry’s first blockbuster. It ran for over three hours at a time when most films were not longer than ten minutes.

   A Hundred Years Later, “The Birth of a Nation” Hasn’t Gone Away

   www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/hundred-years-later-birth-nation-hasnt-gone-away

   See all results for this question

   Did the birth of a nation lead to Hollywood?

   • But The Birth of a Nation, far from falling into oblivion, led to the birth of Hollywood. Instant Praise And Protests Lehr says the film was the Avatar or Star Wars of 1915: It was a runaway hit. After the first screening in Los Angeles, the film got a big thumbs-up. "The critics were raving.

   100 Years Later, What's The Legacy Of 'Birth Of A Nation'? - NPR

   www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2015/02/08/383279630/100-years-later-whats-the-legacy-of-birth-of-a-nation

   See all results for this question

3. Videos

   • 

     2:37

     youtube.com

     THE BIRTH OF A NATION: Official HD Trailer | Watch it Now on Digital HD | FOX Searchlight

     Jun 21, 2016

     3.1M Views

   • 

     3:13:26

     youtube.com

     The Birth of a Nation - Full Movie - (1915) HD - The Masterpiece of Racist Cinema

     Aug 1, 2015

     901.8K Views

   • 

     7:29

     youtube.com

     The Birth of a Nation - Movie Review

     Oct 9, 2016

     292.9K Views

   View all

4. www.rogerebert.com › reviews › great-movie-the-birthThe Birth of a Nation movie review (1915) | Roger Ebert

   www.rogerebert.com › reviews › great-movie-the-birth

   • Cached

   Mar 30, 2003 · "The Birth of a Nation" is not a bad film because it argues for evil. Like Riefenstahl’s “The Triumph of the Will,” it is a great film that argues for evil. To understand how it does so is to learn a great deal about film, and even something about evil.

5. www.reddit.com › r › moviesShould I really bother watching The Birth of a Nation? : r/movies

   www.reddit.com › r › movies

   • Cached

   Q&A. StrawInANeedleStack. •. If you watch it, do it to satisfy your need for completion, or do it as a historical and artistic study.

6. time.com › 4487423Why You Should See The Birth of a Nation | TIME

   time.com › 4487423

   • Cached

   Sep 12, 2016 · The Birth of a Nation isn’t a great movie—it’s hardly even a good one. But it’s bluntly effective, less a monumental piece of filmmaking than an open door. Parker stars as Nat Turner, and his...

7. www.newyorker.com › culture › culture-deskA Hundred Years Later, “The Birth of a Nation” Hasn’t Gone ...

   www.newyorker.com › culture › culture-desk

   Dec 13, 2015 · December 13, 2015. A century after its release, “The Birth of a Nation” still impresses with its technical artistry, and appalls with its racism and nativism. Courtesy Everett. A hundred...

   • Author: Allyson Hobbs

8. Top Stories

   • 
     Digital Trends via Yahoo

     3 underrated Netflix movies you should watch this weekend (May 10-12)

     Looking for some good films to watch on Netflix this weekend? Then stream these underrated movies starring Nicole Kidman, Tina Fey, Sean Penn, and more.

     1 day ago

   View all

9. www.newyorker.com › culture › richard-brodyThe Worst Thing About “Birth of a Nation” Is How Good It Is

   www.newyorker.com › culture › richard-brody

   Feb 1, 2013 · Richard Brody. The Worst Thing About “Birth of a Nation” Is How Good It Is. February 1, 2013. The release of “Django Unchained,” and the discussion surrounding it, have brought “Birth...

10. www.npr.org › sections › codeswitch100 Years Later, What's The Legacy Of 'Birth Of A Nation'? - NPR

    www.npr.org › sections › codeswitch

    Feb 8, 2015 · Epic Film, Embedded Bigotry. The Birth of a Nation is three hours of racist propaganda — starting with the Civil War and ending with the Ku Klux Klan riding in to save the South from black rule...

11. www.nytimes.com › 2016/10/07 › moviesReview: In Nate Parker’s ‘The Birth of a Nation,’ Must-See ...

    www.nytimes.com › 2016/10/07 › movies

    Oct 6, 2016 · “The Birth of a Nation” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). Violence begets violence. Running time: 2 hours.