Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. journals.openedition.org › ejpap › 376Ethics, Knowledge, and Rule-Following - OpenEdition Journals

   journals.openedition.org › ejpap › 376

   • Cached

   Nevertheless, from a pragmatic perspective the question remains as to whether knowledge is a sufficient and appropriate condition for virtue, if, in other words, the originality of the ethical is explicable as a form of propositional knowledge.

   • PDF

     propositional and proposition-based knowledge nor...

   • 2015 The Pragmatist Method

     Ethics, Knowledge, and Rule-Following [Full text] A...

2. www.academia.edu › 13750420 › Ethics_Knowledge_andEthics, Knowledge, and Rule-Following: A Pragmatist View

   www.academia.edu › 13750420 › Ethics_Knowledge_and

   • Cached

   In a irst section I show that Plato and Kant already claimed that the originality of the ethical can’t be represented as either propositional knowledge or a norm, but is instead given to us in a way that is never fully available for our rational grasp.

   • Author: Andreas Hetzel

3. People also ask

   Is the originality of ethics a norm or a propositional knowledge?

   • In a first section I show that Plato and Kant already claimed that the originality of the ethical can’t be represented as either propositional knowledge or a norm, but is instead given to us in a way that is never fully available for our rational grasp.

   Ethics, Knowledge, and Rule-Following - OpenEdition Journals

   journals.openedition.org/ejpap/376

   See all results for this question

   Are moral understanding and moral knowledge related?

   • It’s natural to think of moral understanding and moral knowledge as closely related epistemic phenomena. We say that moral understanding is a matter of knowing right from wrong. Typical sources of moral knowledge—thinking hard about a moral question or having firsthand experiences—are also sources of moral understanding.

   Moral Understanding as Knowing Right from Wrong - The University of

   www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/690011

   See all results for this question

   Does adhering to epistemic norms promote moral good?

   • And if we empirically find that adhering to epistemic norms also promotes the moral good, then there will be an argument from the moral to the epistemic. Finally, norms and types of norms can be in outright tension.

   The Ethics of Belief - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-belief/?ref=byteside

   See all results for this question

   Is moral understanding an epistemic or moral good?

   • Moral understanding is a valuable epistemic and moral good. I argue that moral understanding is the ability to know right from wrong. I defend the account against challenges from nonreductionists, such as Alison Hills, who argue that moral understanding is distinct from moral knowledge.

   Moral Understanding as Knowing Right from Wrong - The University of

   www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/690011

   See all results for this question

4. www.researchgate.net › publication › 314713130Ethics, Knowledge, and Rule-Following: A Pragmatist View

   www.researchgate.net › publication › 314713130

   In a first section I show that Plato and Kant already claimed that the originality of the ethical can’t be represented as either propositional knowledge or a norm, but is instead given to us...

5. human.libretexts.org › Bookshelves › Philosophy7.1: What Epistemology Studies - Humanities LibreTexts

   human.libretexts.org › Bookshelves › Philosophy

   • Cached

   Things You Can Know: Types of Knowledge. Philosophers classify knowledge not only by source but also by type. Propositional knowledge is knowledge of propositions or statements. A proposition or statement is a declarative sentence with a truth value—that is, a sentence that is either true or false.

6. www.journals.uchicago.edu › doi › 10Moral Understanding as Knowing Right from Wrong* | Ethics ...

   www.journals.uchicago.edu › doi › 10

   Abstract. Moral understanding is a valuable epistemic and moral good. I argue that moral understanding is the ability to know right from wrong. I defend the account against challenges from nonreductionists, such as Alison Hills, who argue that moral understanding is distinct from moral knowledge.

   • Author: Paulina A. Sliwa

   • Publish Year: 2017

7. human.libretexts.org › Courses › Lumen_Learning6.1: Ethics – Overview and Coursework - Humanities LibreTexts

   human.libretexts.org › Courses › Lumen_Learning

   • Cached

   Jan 15, 2021 · Key Terms. Ethics, or moral philosophy, is the branch of philosophy concerned with the evaluation of human actions. It is the study of morality, or right and wrong.

8. plato.stanford.edu › entries › ethics-beliefThe Ethics of Belief - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu › entries › ethics-belief

   Jun 14, 2010 · 1. The Ethics of Belief: A brief history. 1.1 Origins of the debate. 1.2 The ethics of belief before the 19 th -century. 2. Doxastic Norms. 2.1 Kinds of norms: prudential, moral, epistemic. 2.2 Structures of norms: hypothetical vs. categorical. 2.3 Degrees of reflective access. 2.4 Relations between doxastic norms. 3.