Ad
related to: is wikipedia a reliable source to citeEliminate errors and work seamlessly across multiple platforms and devices. Write clear, compelling papers and essays with Grammarly’s real-time writing feedback.
- Free Citation Generator
Get citations within seconds.
Never lose points over formatting.
- Tone Detector
Your tone makes an impact,
so say it how you mean it.
- Free Writing Assistant
Improve grammar, punctuation,
conciseness, and more.
- Features
Improve grammar, punctuation,
conciseness, and more.
- Sign-Up
Create a free account today.
Great writing, simplified.
- Free Plagiarism Checker
Compare text to billions of web
pages and major content databases.
- Free Citation Generator
Search results
The fact that Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic research doesn't mean that it's wrong to use basic reference materials when you're trying to familiarize yourself with a topic. In fact, the Harvard librarians can point you to specialized encyclopedias in different fields that offer introductory information.
- How to Cite Wikipedia in Apa Style
- How to Cite Wikipedia in MLA Style
- How to Cite Wikipedia in Chicago Style
- Is Wikipedia A Reliable Source?
In APA Style (7th edition), only the first word of the title is capitalized, and there is no period after the URL. The in-text citation includes the title of the article (with title-case capitalization, and shortened if necessary) and the year. APA recommends linking to a specific archived versionof the Wikipedia article so that the reader can be s...
InMLA style, the title takes headline capitalization, the publisher is included, and there is a period after the URL. The date of last modification can be found at the very bottom of the article (“This page was last edited on…”). MLA Citation Generator
Chicago stylerecommends against citing Wikipedia as a source. However, if you do need to cite it, the format depends on which of Chicago’s two styles of citation you’re following: 1. Notes and bibliography 2. Author-date
Using Wikipedia as a source is generally discouraged in academic writing, and your institution may even have a specific rule against doing so. There is disagreement about whether Wikipedia can be considered a reliable source, but most academics agree that you shouldn’t cite it in your writing, for two main reasons: 1. As an online encyclopedia, Wik...
People also ask
Is Wikipedia a reliable source to cite?
Is Wikipedia a reliable source for academic writing or research?
Should I cite wikipedia?
Is Wikipedia a reliable source?
Nov 4, 2021 · Wikipedia offers free and reliable information instantly. So why do teachers almost universally distrust it? Wikipedia has community-enforced policies on neutrality, reliability and...
Mar 20, 2023 · The five pillars establish Wikipedia as a free online encyclopedia, with articles that are accurate and cite reliable sources, and editors – called Wikipedians – who avoid bias and treat...
References. External links. Reliability of Wikipedia. Article instability and susceptibility to cognitive biases are two potential problem areas in a crowdsourced work like Wikipedia. The reliability of Wikipedia and its user-generated editing model, particularly its English-language edition, has been questioned and tested.
Wikipedia:Citing sources. Shortcuts. WP:CS. WP:CITE. WP:REF. A citation, also called a reference, [note 1] uniquely identifies a source of information, e.g.: Ritter, R. M. (2003). The Oxford Style Manual. Oxford University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-19-860564-5.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to distinguished professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea.
Ad
related to: is wikipedia a reliable source to citeEliminate errors and work seamlessly across multiple platforms and devices. Write clear, compelling papers and essays with Grammarly’s real-time writing feedback.
