Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. May 9, 2022 · Plaintiff Jane Doe, who is a minor, alleges that Roblox incentivizes its users—who are mostly minors—to purchase these items, and that it takes a cut of the profits. Unbeknownst to users, she claims, Roblox will delete some items without warning to induce users to buy more.

  2. On October 5, 2021, Plaintiff A.B. voluntarily dismissed her claims, and counsel in both actions coordinated their efforts to prosecute the instant action filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. On October 12, 2021, Roblox filed a motion to dismiss the complaint and to strike the class allegations and requests for monetary relief. (Dkt. 19.)

  3. Jun 16, 2023 · The original class action complaint for this case was filed in May 2021 by an anonymous Jane Doe, who alleged that "Roblox had a practice of disabling, or “moderating,” users’ access to virtual items they had obtained using virtual currency calledRobux in [Roblox's] virtual marketplace without adequately refunding them."

  4. People also ask

  5. Aug 10, 2023 · Aug 10, 2023|Laura Smith. Facebook. In 2021, a 12-year-old child going by the pseudonym Jane Doe brought a class action against Roblox for losses suffered by millions of kids as a result of the platform’s “content-deletion scheme.”. Her complaint explains that when she was about 10 years old, Jane created a Roblox account, purchased Robux ...

  6. May 26, 2021 · The class action lawsuit was filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe, a minor represented by her father John Dennis, against Roblox Corporation in a California federal court Tuesday. Roblox is one of the largest and fastest growing gaming platforms in the world, designed to bring users together in a virtual universe, the class action explains.

  7. U.S. Judge William H. Orrick of the Northern District of California granted an unopposed motion for final approval of a settlement filed by the 12-year-old plaintiff, Jane Doe, a user of the online video game developed and operated by defendant Roblox Corp.

  8. Mealey's (May 11, 2022, 7:50 AM EDT) -- SAN FRANCISCO — A California federal judge on May 9 found that a putative class action plaintiff is not bound by terms of service for an online video game that she agreed to when she created an account at age 10 and declined to dismiss all but one of her claims for violating California’s unfair compet...