Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. lawphil.net › judjuris › judjurisPhilippine Jurisprudence - The LawPhil Project

   lawphil.net › judjuris › judjuris

   • Cached

   The Lawphil Project. Click on the year to read the full text of the decision.

   • Year 2024 Philippine Jurisprudence

     The Lawphil Project - Year 2022 Supreme Court Decisions

   • Arellano Law Foundation, Inc.

     The Lawphil Project - Philippine Laws and Jurisprudence...

2. lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2019G.R. No. 237020 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2019

   • Cached

   In Freyssinet Filipinas Corp. vs. Lapuz,23 the Court explained that the failure on the part of the employer to file with the DOLE a termination report every time a project or its phase is completed is an indication that the workers are not project employees but regular ones. Burden to prove project employment; On the employer

3. People also ask

   Are alleged projects'specific undertakings' contemplated by law?

   • Unmistakably, the alleged projects stated in the employment contracts were either too vague or imprecise to be considered as the 'specific undertaking' contemplated by law.

   G.R. No. 239622 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/jun2021/gr_239622_2021.html

   See all results for this question

   What is a sub-strand of jurisprudence?

   • However, there is a sub-strand of jurisprudence where, despite apparent similarity with the facts of the foregoing cases, and notwithstanding the existence of the foregoing doctrines in jurisprudence, the project employee was deemed never to have acquired regular status.

   G.R. No. 239622 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2021/jun2021/gr_239622_2021.html

   See all results for this question

   Did respondents report to the Dole 10 the termination of Project Employment?

   • They also stressed that respondents did not report to the DOLE 10 the termination of their supposed project employment. In sum, petitioners remained firm that they were regular employees and that they were terminated without any valid cause and without observance of due process of law.

   G.R. No. 237020 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2019/jul2019/gr_237020_2019.html

   See all results for this question

   Did petitioners' work for respondents end by the supposed completion of a project?

   • This matter only shows that petitioners' work for respondents did not end by the supposed completion of a project because respondents coordinated with and notified them that their services would still be necessary for respondents.

   G.R. No. 237020 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2019/jul2019/gr_237020_2019.html

   See all results for this question

4. lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2021G.R. No. 239622 - The Lawphil Project

   lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2021

   • Cached

   Jun 21, 2022 · The Court resolves the interlocking issues of: (1) whether Carpio is a project-based or regular employee of Modair; and (2) whether Carpio was illegally dismissed. Ruling. The Court partially grants the Petition for Review on Certiorari, resolving the first issue in favor of, and the second issue against, Carpio.

5. chief.lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2021Philippine Jurisprudence - March 2021

   chief.lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2021

   • Cached

   Sonia O. Mahinay vs. Court of Appeals and Alma J. Genotiva G.R. No. 219681-82/G.R. No. 219747 March 18, 2021 Ranulfo C. Feliciano vs. People of the Philippines/Dr. Cesar A. Aquintania vs. People of... Concurring Opinion Justice Alfredo Benjamin S. Caguioa: G.R. No. 250330 March 18, 2021 People of the Philippines vs. Renante Seguisabal y Trasona

6. ww.lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2022Philippine Jurisprudence - October 2022 - The Lawphil Project

   ww.lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2022

   • Cached

   Carlos Cereza, Roger Estolonillo, Raymundo Lopez, Yolanda Pascual, Merly Ann Montes, and May Ann Villa vs. Hon. Danilo V. Suarez, Presiding Judge, Regional Trial Court of Paranaque City, Branch 259, and People of the Philippines G.R. No. 255264 October 10, 2022 Manuel Ong vs. Spouses Rowelito and Amelita Villorente G.R. No. 205641 October 5, 2022