Search results
DEL SOLE, Judge: This is an appeal from a trial court order denying the Appellant's request that a deed creating a tenancy by the entireties in the Appellee and his wife be set aside as fraudulent and the real estate be declared subject to execution by the Appellant judgment creditor. We affirm.
Tuttle, 549 A.2d 151, 378 Pa. Super. 466 Table of Authorities for Leopold v. CourtListener is hosted by Free Law Project, the leading nonprofit using data, technology, and advocacy to make the legal system more equitable.
Therefore, based upon the record and in accordance with the standard set forth in Leopold v. Tuttle, supra, we conclude that Mr. Kingsley and Mr. Smith failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the conveyance was supported by consideration.
Feb 10, 1992 · Leopold v. Tuttle, supra, 378 Pa. Super. at 471, 549 A.2d at 154. The change we propose today in this case need not cause concern for the future ability of creditors to invalidate conveyances which are fraudulent.
at 9–10 (quoting Leopold v. Tuttle, 378 Pa. Super. 466, 472 (1998)). Applying these authorities to this matter, Defendant argues that Plaintiffs’ claims were not reasonably foreseen as arising in the near future at the time of the Conveyances. Id. at 10. In
In each we will focus on a particular area of law, and on a particular set of practical skills and theoretical perspectives on the law. In the first section, we will cover intentional torts. We will also learn about methods of legal argument and the structure of legally protected interests.
On September 12, 2001, Bell again confessed judgment against Bernicker in the amount of $118,347.60 in a civil. action styled William Bell d/b/a Marcris Investments v. William Bernicker, September Term. 2001, No. 1073 (C.C.P. Phila) (the “Bell/Bernicker Judgment”). Bernicker moved to strike this.
