Search results
Fern J. LEOPOLD, Appellant, v. Donald H. TUTTLE, Appellee. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted June 15, 1988. Filed September 19, 1988. Reargument Denied November 16, 1988. *469 Wieslaw T. Niemoczynski, Stroudsburg, for appellant. Franklin R. Innes, Townada, for appellee. Before CIRILLO, President Judge, and WIEAND and DEL SOLE, JJ. DEL ...
Tuttle, 549 A.2d 151, 378 Pa. Super. 466 Table of Authorities for Leopold v. CourtListener is hosted by Free Law Project, the leading nonprofit using data, technology, and advocacy to make the legal system more equitable.
People also ask
What happened in Tuttle vs Oklahoma?
What is the difference between Monell v Tuttle and Tuttle?
Can a municipal policy be causally related to a constitutional violation?
Apr 22, 2016 · Tuttle vs. Oklahoma, 728 F. 2d 456 (10TH CIR 1984) This case stemmed from an Oklahoma City PD officer that responded to robbery in progress call at a bar. This call ultimately turned out to be false and it is speculated that the call was made by Tuttle himself.
Leopold v. Tuttle. The Brocker court determined that nominal consideration is one of the many factors to consider in determining… Tate v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. and Parole. Cary v. Lower Merion School District, 362 Pa. 210, 66 A.2d 762 (1949). Where there are material issues of…
Aug 21, 2017 · Leopold v. Tuttle, 378 Pa. Super. 466, 549 A.2d 151 (Sup. Ct. of Penn. 1988). The Leopold court would allow an Actual Intent Claim to be brought where "the conveying party can reasonably foresee incurring the costs of a claim or judgment at the time of the conveyance". Id. at 466. Plaintiff can find no shelter in this generous reading of the ...
This judgment was subsequently vacated by agreement. On September 12, 2001, Bell again confessed judgment against Bernicker in the amount of $118,347.60 in a civil. action styled William Bell d/b/a Marcris Investments v. William Bernicker, September Term. 2001, No. 1073 (C.C.P. Phila) (the “Bell/Bernicker Judgment”).
the Supreme Court decided City of Oklahoma City v. Tuttle.9 This Note addresses the Tuttle Court's treatment of municipal lia-bility for a supervisory official's failure to remedy police misconduct. Af-ter discussing the facts in Tuttle, this Note examines: (1) the history and
