Search results
Judge: Began active service: Ended active service: Henry Y. Webb: 1820: 1823 Abner Smith Lipscomb: 1820: 1823 Richard Ellis: 1820: 1831 Reuben Saffold: 1820: 1834 Anderson Crenshaw
January 11, 2019. The Supreme Court of Alabama is the highest court in the state of Alabama. The court consists of a chief justice and eight associate justices. Each justice is elected in partisan elections for staggered six-year terms. The Supreme Court is housed in the Heflin-Torbert Judicial Building in downtown Montgomery, Alabama.
- Partisan election
- Alabama Constitution
- 1819
People also ask
What are the responsibilities of the Supreme Court of Alabama?
Who is Alabama's new Chief Justice?
Did Alabama Chief Justice ties to a far-right Christian nationalist movement?
Who governed the Supreme Court of Alabama?
Feb 26, 2024 · February 26, 20244:41 PM ET. Heard on All Things Considered. Odette Yousef. 4-Minute Listen. Playlist. More has become known about the Alabama chief justice's ties to a far-right Christian...
- Odette Yousef
May 19, 2023 · The Alabama Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over all appeals where the amount in controversy exceeds $50,000 and appeals from the Alabama Public Service Commission. The chief justice is the administrative head of the state's judicial system. The Supreme Court may make rules governing administration, practice, and procedure in all courts.
Feb 2, 2023 · Matthew Wilson is an Assistant United States Attorney in the Western District of Tennessee. Wilson brings significant criminal law experience to the Court of Criminal Appeals, including nearly 20 years of legal service at both the state and federal levels.
Justice Wise was elected to the Supreme Court of Alabama in 2010 and was re-elected in 2016 and 2022. She heads the Court's Wise Division. Throughout her tenure on the bench Justice Wise has worked to defend the Constitution, safeguard our liberty, and provide fair and impartial justice for those who come before Alabama's highest court.
2690 (1982), this Court held that President s are abso-lutely immune from private suits for damages based upon their official acts. This Court reached this con-clusion by articulating the following test, to-wit: It is settled law that the separation-of-powers doctrine does not bar every exer-cise of jurisdiction over the President of
