Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Terms in this set (24) Ethical Relativism. The belief that nothing is objectively right or wrong and that the definition of right or wrong depends on the prevailing view of a particular individual, cultural, or historical period. Moral Varies among culturals.

  2. Wong's meta ethical relativism -focuses on certain differences in moral beliefs that are best explained by relativism -emphasis on individual rights/liberties vs emphasis on common good---> Wong thinks both are valid -examines purpose of morality --satisfaction of universal needs determine conditions for an adequate morality

  3. 3. self-deception. 4. ulterior motives/selfishness. 5. weighing competing moral principles differently. Argument supporting ethical relativism. 2.) Argument from tolerance. Argument from Tolerance. P1: Tolerance of other values/cultures/opinions is very good and admirable. P2: So we should accept whichever moral theory most promotes tolerance.

  4. Phil 111 The Fundamentals of Ethics: Ethical Relativism. Share. Moral skepticism. Click the card to flip 👆. the denial of objective moral standards.

  5. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Ethics:, theories relating to truth, Ex of fact that if there = NO moral facts then what does this mean about morals and more.

  6. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like what is the source of morality?, objective basis, subjective basis and more.

  7. 1st argument: 1. A believes that eating the dead is right 2. B believes that burning the dead is right - None of these customs is universally right or wrong - Customs in each society determine what is right within that society 2nd argument: - Social practices and institutions depend on customary ethical beliefs, which are functionally necessary for that society - Those ethical beliefs are true ...