This is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0 FAQ. It aims to answer the most common questions people have about using and distributing code under the MPL. Please note that, while this FAQ is intended to be accurate and helpful, it is not the license , and may not cover important issues that affect you and your specific situation.
- Illa Public License 2.0: The Basics
- Illa Public License 2.0 Use Cases
- Future of The Mozilla Public License 2.0
Open source software licenses fall into two categories: permissive and copyleft. Copyleft licenses, in turn, come in two flavors: strong and weak. The Mozilla Public License 2.0 is in the latter group.
Weak copyleft licenses like the Mozilla Public License 2.0 fill a niche between strong copyleft licenses, such as the GPLs, and permissive ones like MIT or Apache License 2.0. As a result, it serves specific use cases for both authors and companies that rely on open source software.
One recent examinationof projects on GitHub found that approximately 1.4% of works on the platform used the Mozilla Public License 2.0. It was the only weak copyleft license present in any significant number of projects. Couple this fact with its positioning as a “bridge” between GPL-like licenses and permissive ones, and it’s clear MPL 2.0 present...
People also ask
What is the difference between Apache License and Mozilla Public License?
Should I use the MPL 2.0?
What is the difference between the Eclipse Public License and EPL?
Can I use the MPL for non-software works?
Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source/free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 ( html | plain text ). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ .
The text of Mozilla websites is generally licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) or Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license, as indicated. Also, certain Mozilla websites (such as addons.mozilla.org) may allow users to choose Creative Commons licenses for content that they upload to our sites. For more details, see the policy on ...
Jul 14, 2022 · means either the GNU General Public License, Version 2.0, the GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1, the GNU Affero General Public License, Version 3.0, or any later versions of those licenses. 1.13. "Source Code Form". means the form of the work preferred for making modifications. 1.14.
3 days ago · It follows the successful LGPLv2.1 license, and was released by Free Software Foundation as a counterpart to its GNU General Public License version 3. The goal of the GNU Lesser General Public Licenses is to provide software that can be used by both proprietary and free software.
Yahoo Web Search
About 5,530 search results
