Search results
1.12. “Secondary License” means either the GNU General Public License, Version 2.0, the GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1, the GNU Affero General Public License, Version 3.0, or any later versions of those licenses. 1.13. “Source Code Form” means the form of the work preferred for making modifications. 1.14. “You” (or ...
Mozilla Public License 2.0 Requirements. Open source software licenses fall into two categories: permissive and copyleft. Copyleft licenses, in turn, come in two flavors: strong and weak. The Mozilla Public License 2.0 is in the latter group. The difference between the two forms of copyleft licenses lies in the scope of source code to be shared.
People also ask
When did the Mozilla Public License come out?
What is the difference between Mozilla Public License V1 and V2?
Does the Mozilla Foundation have an open source license?
What is the difference between MPL v2 and Apache License v2?
Pros and Cons of using MPL-2.0 license? Asked 4 years, 7 months ago. Modified 2 years ago. Viewed 31k times. 29. I want to license my project (hosted on GitHub) under MPL-2.0, which looks like a reasonable choice. But since I'm not a lawyer, it's hard to estimate long-term benefits and consequences of this choice.
Mozilla Public License; Author: Mozilla Foundation: Latest version: 2.0: Publisher: Mozilla Foundation: Published: January 3, 2012: SPDX identifier: MPL-2.0 MPL-1.1 MPL-1.0 (see list for more) Debian FSG compatible: Yes: FSF approved: Yes: OSI approved: Yes: GPL compatible: 2.0 and later: Yes (by default, unless marked as "Incompatible With ...
Mar 6, 2012 · In comparison with the Mozilla Public License v1.1, the Mozilla Public License v2: amended conditions around patent licence termination, making it compatible with the Apache Software License v2. introduces compatibility with the GNU GPLv2, GNU LGPL v2.1, GNU Affero GPL v3 and all subsequent versions of those licences. is simpler and shorter.
