Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPLMozilla Public Licence — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPL

   • Cached

   About the License. Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source / free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 ( html | plain text ). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ.

   • Version 2.0

     1.12. “Secondary License” means either the GNU General...

     Changes From MPL 1.1

     · Mpl-In-Gpl Developer Guidelines

     · Permissive-Code-Into-Mpl Developer Guidelines

     · Revision Process and Changes FAQ

   • MPL 1.1

     the licenses granted in this Section 2.1 and are effective...

     Mozilla Public License Version 1.1

     · MPL 1.1 FAQ

   • Mozilla Licensing Policies

     Mozilla Monitor. See if your email has appeared in a...

   • Appropriate Header Text

     Mozilla License Headers This page gives copy-and-pasteable...

   • Historical Documents

     Mozilla Public License, version 1.1 This is the Mozilla...

   • MPL 2.0 FAQ

     About This FAQ. This is the Mozilla Public License (MPL)...

2. fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101

   • Cached

   Mozilla Public License 2.0 Requirements. Open source software licenses fall into two categories: permissive and copyleft. Copyleft licenses, in turn, come in two flavors: strong and weak. The Mozilla Public License 2.0 is in the latter group. The difference between the two forms of copyleft licenses lies in the scope of source code to be shared.

3. People also ask

   What is the Mozilla Public License?

   • Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source / free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 ( html | plain text ). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ.

   Mozilla Public Licence — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/

   See all results for this question

   What is the difference between MPL & Mozilla Public License?

   • MPL 2.0 works particularly well for programs that can use proprietary plug-ins (like some plug-ins to the Firefox browser). Mozilla Public License 2.0 contains an express patent license, but also some terms to clarify the scope of the license. It contains a disclaimer of implied licenses and also a strong defensive termination provision.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-mozilla-public-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

   Does Mozilla have an open source license?

   • Open source software contributors, however, may also know Mozilla for its commitment to keeping the internet a free and public resource, a mission that matches the ethos of OSS development. It’s therefore no surprise that the Mozilla Foundation has created its own open source license, the Mozilla Public License.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-mozilla-public-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

   What's new in MPL 2.0?

   • Now they've taken the next step by including compatibility provisions in MPL 2.0. The MPL 2.0 entry on our license list and Mozilla's own FAQ explain those terms in more detail. This approach to license compatibility is cleaner and more consistent than releasing software under multiple licenses.

   The Mozilla Public License version 2.0 is out—and GPL-compatible!

   www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/mpl-2.0-release

   See all results for this question

4. opensource.stackexchange.com › questions › 8831licensing - Pros and Cons of using MPL-2.0 license? - Open ...

   opensource.stackexchange.com › questions › 8831

   • Cached

   Some similar questions are probably already answered here, but they answered for different licenses (like Apache-2.0). I would like to have a more understandable explanation about MPL-2.0 pros and cons in one place. licensing. license-compatibility. license-recommendation.

5. wiki.mozilla.org › MPL_UpgradeMPL Upgrade - MozillaWiki

   wiki.mozilla.org › MPL_Upgrade

   • Cached

   Jan 11, 2012 · The tri-licence makes our code forwardly-compatible with the following existing licences: MPL 1.1, MPL 2.0, and later versions. LGPL 2.1, LGPL 3.0, and later versions. GPL 2.0, GPL 3.0, and later versions. AGPL 3.0, and later versions. When we upgrade to MPL 2, that list will technically be the same, with the obvious exception of MPL 1.1 ...

6. www.fsf.org › blogs › licensingThe Mozilla Public License version 2.0 is out—and GPL ...

   www.fsf.org › blogs › licensing

   • Cached

   Jan 5, 2012 · The Mozilla Foundation recognizes how important this compatibility is to free software projects, and to date they've made their own projects compatible by tri-licensing them under the MPL 1.1, GPL version 2 or later, and LGPL version 2.1 or later. Now they've taken the next step by including compatibility provisions in MPL 2.0.