Search results
Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source / free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 ( html | plain text ). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ. MPL 2.0 Revision Process.
- Version 2.0
means either the GNU General Public License, Version 2.0,...
- MPL 1.1
Mozilla Public License Version 1.1 1. Definitions. 1.0.1....
- Mozilla Licensing Policies
The text of Mozilla websites is generally licensed under a...
- Appropriate Header Text
Mozilla License Headers This page gives copy-and-pasteable...
- Historical Documents
Mozilla Public License, version 1.1 This is the Mozilla...
- Version 2.0
- Illa Public License 2.0 Requirements
- Illa Public License 2.0 vs. Other Weak Copyleft Licenses
- Illa Public License 2.0 Use Cases
- Future of The Mozilla Public License 2.0
Open source software licenses fall into two categories: permissive and copyleft. Copyleft licenses, in turn, come in two flavors: strong and weak. The Mozilla Public License 2.0 is in the latter group. The difference between the two forms of copyleft licenses lies in the scope of source code to be shared. Strong copyleft licenses like GPL v2 and GP...
Other weak copyleft licenses include the GNU Lesser Public License (LGPL), the Eclipse Public License (EPL), and the Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL). In this section, we’ll compare both with the Mozilla Public License 2.0.
Weak copyleft licenses like the Mozilla Public License 2.0 fill a niche between strong copyleft licenses, such as the GPLs, and permissive ones like MIT or Apache License 2.0. As a result, it serves specific use cases for both authors and companies that rely on open source software.
One recent examinationof projects on GitHub found that approximately 1.4% of works on the platform used the Mozilla Public License 2.0. It was the only weak copyleft license present in any significant number of projects. Couple this fact with its positioning as a “bridge” between GPL-like licenses and permissive ones, and it’s clear MPL 2.0 present...
People also ask
What is the difference between Apache License and Mozilla license?
Does Mozilla Firefox meet the requirements of Section 3?
What is the difference between Eclipse Public License and EPL?
This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this file, You can obtain one at https://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. However, you don't need to put the notice in each file if it is "not possible or desirable" as per the license :
Jan 30, 2024 · This is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0 FAQ. It aims to answer the most common questions people have about using and distributing code under the MPL. Please note that, while this FAQ is intended to be accurate and helpful, it is not the license , and may not cover important issues that affect you and your specific situation.
https://opensource.org/licenses/MPL-2.0 https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/FAQ/. I've done some reading and here is my perceptions: It's a "modern" license with protections against patent disputes like the Apache 2.0, but unlike the Apache 2.0 license it's not incompatible with the GPLv2.
Version 2.0 is, by default, compatible with LGPL and GPL version 2 or greater. You can distribute binaries under a proprietary license, as long as you make the source available under MPL. Disclaimer: this is only a short summary of the Full Text. No information on TLDRLegal is legal advice.
The Mozilla Public License (MPL) is a free and open-source weak copyleft license for most Mozilla Foundation software such as Firefox and Thunderbird. The MPL license is developed and maintained by Mozilla, which seeks to balance the concerns of both open-source and proprietary developers; it is distinguished from others as a middle ground between the permissive software BSD-style licenses and ...
