Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Name_callingName calling - Wikipedia

    Name-calling is a form of argument in which insulting or demeaning labels are directed at an individual or group. This phenomenon is studied by a variety of academic disciplines such as anthropology, child psychology, and political science.

  2. Nov 29, 2023 · Name-calling: Name-calling involves using derogatory terms to describe an opponent or enemy. Appealing to emotions: Propaganda often relies on emotional appeals to influence people's opinions. For example, propaganda might incite fear or create anger to get people to support a particular cause.

  3. Name-calling Propagandists use the name-calling technique to incite fears and arouse prejudices in their hearers in the intent that the bad names will cause hearers to construct a negative opinion about a group or set of beliefs or ideas that the propagandist wants hearers to denounce. The method is intended to provoke conclusions about a ...

  4. Sep 22, 2022 · A record amount is being spent on political advertising in the midterm elections. But evidence shows that negative ads might work counteractively, discouraging voters from casting ballots...

  5. Jonathon Reinhardt and Anuj Gupta. ⇒ 7.1 Introduction: Presidential nicknames. ⇒ 7.2 Name-calling: The pejorative use of epithets. ⇒ 7.3 The origins of epithets: A fitting name. ⇒ 7.4 Why do we name-call others? ⇒ 7.5 From name-calling to scapegoating. ⇒ 7.6 Comprehensive Reflection/Discussion Questions. ⇒ 7.7 Key Points. ⇒ 7.8 Key Concepts.

  6. 1. Name calling-The propagandist "to those individuals, groups, nations, which he would have us condemn. prone to use without clarification or. 2. Glittering generalities-The propagandist. words" such as "truth, freedom, honor, to work, loyalty, progress, democracy, with name calling, the idea was to. the influence of an emotional impression. 3.

  7. www.sourcewatch.org › index › Name-callingName-calling - SourceWatch

    Sep 23, 2007 · Name-calling is a form of ad hominem attack that draws a vague equivalence between a concept and a person, group or idea. By linking the person or idea being attacked to a negative symbol, the propagandist hopes that the audience will reject the person or the idea on the basis of the symbol, instead of looking at the available evidence.

  1. People also search for