Yahoo Web Search

  1. About 97,000 search results

  1. People also ask

    What is the main goal of no child left behind?

    What replaced no child left behind?

    What to do with no child left behind?

    What are some criticisms of no child left behind?

  2. “No Child Left Behnd is based on testing, blaming and punishing,” explained Lisa Guisbond, co-author of the FairTest report. “a more helpful accountability system would focus first on building the capacity of teachers, schools and districts to ensure that all children receive a high quality education that meets their individual needs.”

  3. and number No Child Left Behind submitted No Child Left Behind of No Child Left Behind The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 was formed during the governance of then President George W. Bush as an educational reform aimed to “improve student achievement and change the culture of America's schools” (U.S. Department of Education, 2005, par. 1).

  4. President Bush’s No Child Left Behind Act was passed by the congress on the 8th day of January 2002 with the main emphasis being on accountability (Testing) in addition StudentShare Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done.

    • No Child Left Behind Act
    • Impacts of NCLB Act on Education
    • Impact on Teachers, Schools, and School Districts
    • Impact on Curriculum and Standards
    • Impact on Racial and Ethnic Minority Learners
    • Impact on Low-Performing Learners and Disabled Learners
    • Conclusion
    • References

    The NCLB Act is legislation in USA aimed for public schools with the intention of advocating for offering standard based education, and at the same time improving pupils education through setting high standards and goals (Olivert, 2007). The Act was proposed by George W. Bush in 2002 and passed after getting cross-party support in congress. The Act...

    The Act resulted in impacts on: teachers, schools, and school districts; curriculum and standards; racial and ethnic minority students; and low performing and disabled students.

    Supporters of NCLB highlight that the legislation supports accountability in leaning institutions. The requirement that schools are to pass yearly tests is a benchmark that makes sure that schools perform at certain levels. Schools that do not improve after poor results will have reduced funds and other punishments all of which increase accountabil...

    There are instances that the law may decrease education levels of certain schools and their curriculum. This is a likely scenario when each state produces easier sub-standard tests for more of their student to pass. An example is seen when the State of Missouri in 2007 openly admitted to lowering test standards so that learners could pass (Daly et ...

    The Act has been very beneficial in bridging the gap between performances in schools amongst races. This is done through leveling expectations and requiring schools and districts to focus their attention on historically maligned groups such as disabled students, low-income, and racial groups like Latinas or African American (Olivert, 2007). Each St...

    The NCLB act entails rewards and proposals which in the real sense act against low-performing learners. This is so because measures imposed when schools fail are castigatory and aimed at making lower expectations as opposed to higher ones (NEA). Furthermore, the incentive systems highly motivate schools, districts, and States to manipulate results....

    The NCLB Act has been very instrumental in increasing the effectiveness of teaching students. It has shifted education from being solely dependent on being results oriented to making sure that no student is left behind despite their misgivings. It has allowed many students to get a second chance even when they performed poorly in AYP scores. Howeve...

    Daly, B. P., Burke, R., Hare, I., Mills, C., Owens, C., Moore, E., & Weist, M. D. (2006). Enhancing No Child Left Behind–School Mental Health Connections. Journal Of School Health, 76(9), 446-451. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00142.x Hulgin, K., & Drake, B. M. (2011). Inclusive education and the No Child Left Behind Act: resisting entrenchment. Int...

    • Overview and Purpose
    • Local and School Board Policy/Rules
    • Opinios and Views
    • References

    The USCO or Unsafe School Choice Option (Elementary and Secondary Education Act, section 9532) of 1965, as improved by the 2001 No Child Left Behind Act, states that each State getting finances under the ESEA should employ and create a state-wide rule obliging that students who are enrolled in a continually unsafe public elementary or secondary sch...

    Policy is a very important role of the school board in our education system. Like the city coucils, state legislatures and Congress, school boards created the structure and direction of their schools by implementing policies through the power granted by the state representatives. The Board of Education is dedicated in upholding a secure and drug-fr...

    In summary, I support No Child Left Behind because it gives importance on methods and instruction that have been confirmed to work. Making billion-dollar investments yearly, this policy ensures children on their third grade, learn how to read. Since the law’s reaction if the school fails to make sufficient development is not simply to offer further...

    Canal Winchester Local School District Bylaws & Policies (2007). School Safety. Retrieved
    August 31, 2007, from
    http://www.neola.com/canalwinchester-oh/search/policies/po8400.htm
    Department of Education United States of America (2004). Unsafe School Choice Option.
  1. People also search for