Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. www.researchgate.net › publication › 326733519Repossession of Goods by the Owner under the Malaysian...

   www.researchgate.net › publication › 326733519

   Aug 1, 2018 · Motors S dn Bhd v Lee Aik Seng [13], where a car was . taken by the respondent on hire-purchase agreement . ... [13] Pang Brothers Motors Sdn Bhd v Lee Aik Seng [1978] 1 MLJ 179.

   • Login

     Motors S dn Bhd v Lee Aik Seng [13], where a car was . taken...

   • Help Center

     © 2008-2024 ResearchGate GmbH. All rights reserved. Terms;...

2. www.academia.edu › 70102976 › Repossession_of_Goods(PDF) Repossession of Goods by the Owner under the Malaysian ...

   www.academia.edu › 70102976 › Repossession_of_Goods

   • Cached

   The owner can retake possession of the goods only after the expiry of the notice period and if the overdue instalments are not settled by then. In Pang Brothers Motors Sdn Bhd v Lee Aik Seng [13], where a car was taken by the respondent on hire-purchase agreement with the appellant.

   • Author: Ahmad Masum

3. People also ask

   What happened in Pang brothers Motors v Lee Aik Seng?

   • Pang Brothers Motors Sdn Bhd v Lee Aik Seng 1 MLJ 179 -A car was taken by the R on hire purchase with the A. R failed to pay the instalments due and the appellant issued a notice under section 16 (1). Held: the date specified in the notice was two days short of the statutory minimum and the notice was null and void.

   Chapter 10 Hire Purchase Law - Studocu

   www.studocu.com/my/document/universiti-malaya/law-notes/chapter-10-hire-purchase-law/17540629

   See all results for this question

   What is a tractor V Kumpulan Pembinaan Malaysia Sdn Bhd?

   • In Tractors Malaysia Bhd v Kumpulan Pembinaan Malaysia Sdn Bhd , the Federal Court decided that on a proper 20 fAhmad Masum, / Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 1 (1) 2018, Pages: 19-24 the goods from the hirer. Therefore unlike a sale of goods, no title to the goods passes from the owner to the hirer during the period of hire.

   Repossession of Goods by the Owner under the Malaysian Hire-Purchase

   www.academia.edu/70102976/Repossession_of_Goods_by_the_Owner_under_the_Malaysian_Hire_Purchase_Act_1967_An_Overview

   See all results for this question

   What are the goods involved in Kesang leasing Sdn Bhd?

   • Kesang Leasing Sdn. Bhd V. Mohd Yusof Bin Ismail & Anor (1990) 1MLJ 119 The goods involved are computers where the parties agreed to be bound under HP Act. i.

   Chapter 5 Hire Purchase - BUSINESS LAW (LAW 416) Chapter 5 HIRE

   www.studocu.com/my/document/mara-university-of-technology-shah-alam/business-law/chapter-5-hire-purchase/61293650

   See all results for this question

4. www.studocu.com › my › documentChapter 10 Hire Purchase Law - Sewa beli merngkumi ... - Studocu

   www.studocu.com › my › document

   • Cached

   Pang Brothers Motors Sdn Bhd v Lee Aik Seng [1975] 1 MLJ 179 -A car was taken by the R on hire purchase with the A. R failed to pay the instalments due and the appellant issued a notice under section 16(1). Held: the date specified in the notice was two days short of the statutory minimum and the notice was null and void.

   • 5/5 (1)

5. www.studocu.com › my › documentChapter 5 Hire Purchase - BUSINESS LAW (LAW 416 ... - Studocu

   www.studocu.com › my › document

   • Cached

   Pang Brothers Motors Sdn Bhd v. Lee Aik Seng. Held: the repossession done before the expiration of 21 days of the 4th Schedule notice renders it void. In this case, the date specified in the notice of repossession was bad in law as it was 2 days short of the statutory minimum 21 days.

   • 5/5 (1)

6. Videos

   • 

     powtoon.com

     Pang Brothers Motors V Lee Aik Seng Case Study | Created using Powtoon - The Visual Communication Platform

     Jan 16, 2019

     0 Views

   • 

     powtoon.com

     Pang Brothers Motors Sdn Bhd V Lee Aik Seng | Created using Powtoon - The Visual Communication Platform

     Aug 10, 2018

     0 Views

   • 

     2:11

     youtube.com

     Recycle Trailer Subtitled Version (The Pang Brothers)

     Mar 14, 2012

     38K Views

   View all

7. www.studocu.com › my › documentLAW416 - BUSINESS LAW TEST - LAW (TEST) - Studocu

   www.studocu.com › my › document

   • Cached

   Case related for this process is Pang Brothers Motor Sdn Bhd v Lee Aik Seng [1978] 1 MLJ 179. The appellants issued a notice to repossess the car which was 2 days short of statutory minimum 21 days. It was held that the notice has no effect under the law.

   • 5/5 (2)

8. www.researchgate.net › publication › 345750152_HIRE(PDF) HIRE PURCHASE - ResearchGate

   www.researchgate.net › publication › 345750152_HIRE

   Nov 11, 2020 · Pang Brothers Motors Sdn Bhd v. Lee . Aik Seng [1978] 1 MLJ 179. Abdul K ashab Hj Hanafi v. Hong . Leong Bank Bhd [2016] 8 CLJ 48 7. Citations (0) References (0)

9. www.powtoon.com › online-presentation › e2UHvWlZK7fBusiness Law : Pang Brothers Motors Sdn Bhd VS Lee Aik Seng

   www.powtoon.com › online-presentation › e2UHvWlZK7f

   • Cached

   The respondent failed to pay the installment due and the appellant issued notice under section 16 (1) was in fact served.FACTS OF THE CASEDETAILS OF THE CASELEE AIK SENGApplied to a higher court for a reversal of the decision of a lower courtHe sued the Pang Brothers Motor Sdn BhdPANG BROTHERS MOTOR SDN BHDDefending against a petitionBeing sued ...