Ad
related to: passenger 57 movie reviewEnjoy low prices on earth's biggest selection of books, electronics, home, apparel & more. Find deals and low prices on pasenger 57 at Amazon.com
Search results
- R1992 · Action · 1h 23m
People also ask
Is Passenger 57 a good movie?
What is Passenger 57 about?
Is Passenger 57 a good action game?
Is Passenger 57 the worst?
Rated: 4/5 Apr 14, 2024 Full Review David Nusair Reel Film Reviews ...a briskly paced (yet undeniably dated) thriller that's been jam-packed with exciting, memorable action set-pieces...
- Passenger 57 Pictures
Passenger 57 Pictures and Photo Gallery -- Check out just...
- Movie Reviews
Top Critics. All Audience. Verified Audience. Eddie Harrison...
- Lock Up
Blake E Went to the theater and seen this with my dad and...
- Trailers & Videos
View HD Trailers and Videos for Passenger 57 on Rotten...
- Passenger 57 Pictures
Charles Rane (Bruce Payne) is a ruthless terrorist. The FBI manages to capture him right before he is able to get plastic surgery. Former secret service agent John Cutter (Wesley Snipes) is still haunted by his dead wife. His old friend Sly Delvecchio (Tom Sizemore) gets him an airline security job.
Nov 6, 1992 · Passenger 57: Directed by Kevin Hooks. With Wesley Snipes, Bruce Payne, Tom Sizemore, Alex Datcher. An airline security expert must take action when he finds himself trapped on a passenger jet when terrorists seize control of it.
- (50K)
- Action, Crime, Thriller
- Kevin Hooks
- 1992-11-06
On Rotten Tomatoes it has an approval rating of 27% based on 26 reviews, with an average rating of 4.5/10. The consensus states: "Wesley Snipes tries to pilot Passenger 57 away from turbulence, but even he can't help this implausible coach-class action bomber from nose-diving."
- $15 million
- Stanley Clarke
- November 6, 1992
- Dan Paulson, Lee Rich, Dylan Sellers
Aug 7, 2023 · Passenger 57 is a clear Die Hard knockoff that does have the benefit of Bruce Payne’s well-articulated and brutal villain, and Tom Sizemore’s charismatic performance, and some good one-liners, but suffers due to generic writing and a second half that is a lot less tense than the first.