Search results
Definition. Phonological development of Proto-Armenian. History. See also. References. Sources. External links. Proto-Armenian language. Proto-Armenian is the earlier, unattested stage of the Armenian language which has been reconstructed by linguists.
Proto-Armenian differentiated from Phrygian by language evolution over time but also by the Hurro-Urartian language substrate influence. Classification is difficult because little is known of Phrygian, but Proto-Armenian arguably forms a subgroup with Greek and Indo-Iranian.
People also ask
What is Proto-Armenian language?
Is Armenian a proto-language?
Was Proto-Armenian related to Phrygian?
What does Armeno-Phrygian mean?
Proto-Armenian is the earlier, unattested stage of the Armenian language which has been reconstructed by linguists. As Armenian is the only known language of its branch of the Indo-European languages , the comparative method cannot be used to reconstruct its earlier stages.
Proto-Oceanic. Proto-Central Pacific language. Proto-Polynesian. Proto-Admiralty Islands. Proto-Temotu language. Proto-Micronesian language. Proto-Torres–Banks language. Proto-Kra–Dai. Proto-Kra ( list)
Proto-Armenian is the earlier, unattested stage of the Armenian language which has been reconstructed by linguists. As Armenian is the only known language of its branch of the Indo-European languages, the comparative method cannot be used to reconstruct its earlier stages. Instead, a combination of internal and external reconstruction, by reconstructions of Proto-Indo-European and other ...
Wikidata. Q3848498. Proto-Armenian is a reconstructed language. Its words and roots are not directly attested in any written works, but have been reconstructed through the comparative method, which finds regular similarities between languages that cannot be explained by coincidence or word-borrowing, and extrapolates ancient forms from these ...
Historical Phonology of Classical Armenian Preface When Kortlandt told me that his articles on Armenian would be collected and edited, I suggested that he should add a systematic presentation of the historical phonology, so that it would be easy to find his ideas and to see the coherence. He agreed, on condition that I would write it.
