Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. While this requirement has been held to preclude one who has voted in the party primary from appearing on the ballot as an independent, Westerman v. Mims, 111 Tex. 29, 227 S.W. 178; see Cunningham v. McDermett, Tex.Civ.App., 277 S.W. 218, one who lost at the primary may still be elected at the general election by a write-in vote. Cunningham v.

  2. In Grovey v. Townsend (1935), the Supreme Court ruled that this practice was constitutional, as it was administered by the Democratic Party, which legally was a private institution, not a state institution. In 1944, however, in Smith v. Allwright, the Supreme Court ruled 8–1 against the Texas white primary system.

  3. Jan 24, 2007 · [6] The extent to which the state controls the primary election machinery appears from the Texas statutes, as follows: Art. 3118, Vernon’s Texas Statutes, provides for the election of a county chairman for each party holding a primary by the ‘qualified voters of the whole county,’ and of one member of the party’s county executive committee by the ‘qualified voters of their respective ...

  4. Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944), was an important decision of the United States Supreme Court with regard to voting rights and, by extension, racial desegregation. Court Documents. Opinion of the Court. Separate Opinion. Roberts.

  5. Get Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.

  6. Mar 5, 2016 · Condon (1932). The Texas Democratic Convention, a private body, thus restricted participation in primaries to whites-only. Enlisting black Houston dentist Dr. Lonnie Smith as plaintiff, NAACP counsel unsuccessfully contested the party's racial exclusion in state court. He appealed and the Court overturned the “white primary” in Smith 8–1.

  7. A summary of the state statutes regulating primaries appears in the footnote. 6 These nominations are to be made by the qualified voters of the party. Art. 3101. [321 U.S. 649, 654] The Democratic Party of Texas is held by the Supreme Court of that state to be a 'voluntary association,' Bell v.

  1. People also search for