Yahoo Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: subaru forester vs outback cargo space
  2. Spacious interior offers up to 111.6 cu feet of passenger space with premium materials. SUBARU STARLINK® Multimedia with standard Apple CarPlay® and Android Auto™ integration

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. We find the Forester is more by-the-book — a conventional small SUV with more cargo space and off-road ability than rivals. The Outback is less bound by traditional constraints.

    • Powertrain
    • Towing
    • Size
    • Technology
    • Comfort and Convenience
    • Design/Styling
    • Handling
    • Pricing
    • Our Choice: Subaru Outback

    The Forester has only one powertrain option: a naturally aspirated 2.5-liter flat-four engine connected to a continuously variable transmission(CVT). It produces 182 horsepower and 176 pound-feet of torque, which feels adequate for the Forester, but there are still some times when we wish the Forester offered a turbocharged engine as it did in the ...

    The Forester is rated to towup to 1,500 pounds. The Outback with the same engine can tow up to 2,700 pounds. Equipped with the 2.5T in the XT models, that tow rating increases to more than double that of the Forester, at 3,500 pounds. Just food for thought if you’ve got toys or a small camper to haul around.

    This is the most obvious and probably the most important difference between the two vehicles, on par with price. The Outback is the bigger vehicle of the two, but interestingly enough, they have similar amounts of cargo space on paper, with the Forester at 31.1 cubic feet, and the Outback at 32.5 behind the rear seats. (Max cargo area is a similar ...

    The Outback is by far the better choice here. All but the base trim have the new, gigantic tablet-style display (almost 12 inches) that puts all its various infotainment functions at your fingertips. It takes a little time to learn the locations of all the functions, but once you’re familiar, it’s nice to have it all in one place. The Forester, on ...

    Again, the Outback is the winner here. Fitand finish are simply better. Where materials can clash in terms of look and feel in the Forester, they play together better in the Outback. From a brand that has struggled to makes its interiors look and feel upscale, the Outback achieves a sense of quality, while the Forester can still feel planted in the...

    This is subjective, of course, but we argue the Outback is the better-looking vehicle. It has more curves and a bigger presence than the humble Forester. It looks more like a wagon than an SUV, while the opposite can be said for the Outback. If you like a more utilitarian approach, you might dig the Forester more. Its proportions are tighter and bo...

    On the road the wagonish Outback feels more car-like, which ought not surprise anyone considering its similarities to the Legacysedan. We like the way its longer wheelbase helps it track true on the highway, and how its lower height and extra width allow it to feel more stable tracking though corners. The Forester, on the other hand, is a mite more...

    These two Subarus are closer in price than you might expect, at least at their base levels. The 2020 Forester starts at $25,505 (including $1,010 in destination fees). The base Outback starts at $27,655. The Outback can be had in more varieties, however, and the price differential is greater when you compare the top end of each model lineup. While ...

    If it hasn’t been clear enough, we like the Outback better than the Forester, all things considered. The stronger interior quality, the stable ride, the superior infotainment technology and the better (we think) looks make the Outback well worth the reasonable price premium over the Forester. The turbocharged engine option in the Outback only exten...

    • John Beltz Snyder
  3. Apr 3, 2024 · The Outback offers more cargo space. Behind the second row, the Forester has 28.9 cubic feet of cargo room, or 2 cubes less with a sunroof, compared to the Outback's 32.6. With the seats...

    • Subaru
    • Kelly Lin
    • 9 min
    • 75
  4. Aug 1, 2023 · The Subaru Forester provides 28.9 cubic feet of storage space behind the rear seats and 74.2 cubic feet with the seatbacks folded down. But the Outback is just a tad more generous in this...

    • subaru forester vs outback cargo space1
    • subaru forester vs outback cargo space2
    • subaru forester vs outback cargo space3
    • subaru forester vs outback cargo space4
    • subaru forester vs outback cargo space5
  5. The Forester gives you slightly more interior space with up to 111.6 cubic feet of passenger room and up to 74.2 cubic feet of cargo room with the standard 60/40-split flat-folding rear seatbacks folded down.

  6. Jun 4, 2021 · Bottom Line: The Outback may be the larger vehicle, but that only translates into more cargo space, and more second-row head space. Its interior feels nicer however, and it’s that...

  7. Compare the 2021 Subaru Outback with the 2021 Subaru Forester: car rankings, scores, prices and specs.

  1. People also search for