supreme court of the philippines jurisprudence

Search results

sc.judiciary.gov.ph › decisionsDecisions - Supreme Court of the Philippines

sc.judiciary.gov.ph › decisions
- Cached
Decisions, Signed Resolutions, and Issuances by the Supreme Court in the last 12 months. Disclaimer *Only the case title is searchable. For terms stated in the decision, you may search the E-Library. Reminder Reset your search by clearing ALL filters. Title/Keywords:
- SC E-Library
  CONTACT: Supreme Court of the Philippines Library Services,...
- The Supreme Court E-Library
  The E-Library is now the website which has the complete...
lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2020G.R. No. 241257 - The Lawphil Project

lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2020
- Cached
EN BANC. [ G.R. No. 241257, September 29, 2020 ] PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. BRENDO P. PAGAL, A.K.A. "DINDO," ACCUSSED-APPELLANT. DECISION. GESMUNDO, J.: "For there is but one essential justice which cements society, and one law which establishes this justice. This law is right reason, which is the true rule of all ...
People also ask
When did Justice Carpio upload the Supreme Court decisions?
On June 1, 2012, Senior Associate Justice Antonio T. Carpio directed the uploading into the E-Library the Decisions of the Supreme Court from 1901 to present and All Laws - Acts, Commonwealth Acts, Presidential Decrees, Batas Pambansa and Republic Acts from September 1900 to present.

The Supreme Court E-Library - Supreme Court E-Library

elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/aboutus/scelibrary
See all results for this question
Did the appellant's rights be observed in the proceedings a quo?
There is also no record anywhere that the defense counsel presented evidence for the accused nor that the trial court even inform him of his right to do so if he so desires. For these reasons, it cannot be said that the appellant's rights were observed in the proceedings a quo.

G.R. No. 241257 - The Lawphil Project

lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2020/sep2020/gr_241257_2020.html
See all results for this question
Why did the court remand the case in Murillo?
The Court's recital of facts in Murillo was expressly prefaced with the statement that the prosecution's witnesses established the following facts. 138 However, the Court deemed it proper to remand the case because the defense failed to faithfully protect the rights of therein accused in the face of the evidence mounted by the prosecution.

G.R. No. 241257 - The Lawphil Project

lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2020/sep2020/gr_241257_2020.html
See all results for this question
Why did the court decide people V Crisologo 145?
Meanwhile, in People v. Crisologo, 145 the Court, through Senior Associate Justice Teodoro R. Padilla, decided the case on the merits despite the accused, who was deaf-mute, having been arraigned without an interpreter for the sign language.

G.R. No. 241257 - The Lawphil Project

lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2020/sep2020/gr_241257_2020.html
See all results for this question
lawphil.net › judjuris › judjurisPhilippine Jurisprudence - The LawPhil Project

lawphil.net › judjuris › judjuris
- Cached
The Lawphil Project. Click on the year to read the full text of the decision.
lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2021Year 2021 Philippine Jurisprudence - The Lawphil Project

lawphil.net › judjuris › juri2021
The Lawphil Project - Year 2021 Supreme Court Decisions
Videos
View all
chanrobles.com › cralaw › 2021decisionsJanuary 2021 JURISPRUDENCE : PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT ...

chanrobles.com › cralaw › 2021decisions
- Cached
January-2021. G.R. No. 220606 - MIGUEL D. GOCOLAY, PETITIONER, VS.MICHAEL BENJO GOCOLAY, Respondent. G.R. No. 248652 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. ANTONIO M. TALAUE, ACCUSED-APPELLANT.