Search results
Mar 6, 2020 · The case against the Guildford Four involved massive failure to disclose evidence, the disappearance of material evidence, perjury, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and perversion of the course of justice, forgery, criminal behaviour towards people in detention, withholding and concealment of the alibi evidence in relation to Gerard ...
People also ask
Did the Guildford Four pervert the course of Justice?
Why were the Guildford Four released?
Why were the Guildford Four acquitted?
What time is from inside the Guildford Four on BBC iPlayer?
Oct 4, 2014 · The Guildford Four were released from jail 25 years ago, after serving years in jail for crimes they did not commit. The prison letters of one of the men, Paul Hill, tell his story.
- Martin Mcnamara
Oct 6, 2017 · The Guildford Four were wrongfully convicted over the bombings in one of the UK's worst miscarriages of justice. KRW Law said newly-released archive material contained "evidence of perverting...
On 22 October 1975, the Guildford Four – Gerald Conlon, Paul Hill, Patrick Armstrong and Carole Richardson – were convicted of murder, before Justice Donaldson and a jury of conspiracy. They were all given life sentences.
Paul Hill, Gerry Conlon, Paddy Armstrong, and Carole Richardson (known as the Guildford Four) were convicted of murder for blowing up two pubs in Guildford. Conlon and Hill were identified as suspects as they were residents of Northern Ireland who had been in the area.
Jun 23, 2023 · The Guildford Four are universally acknowledged to be victims of one of the most serious miscarriages of justice and for which they spent 15 years in prison. The Coroner also rejected an Article 2 Inquest.
Oct 6, 2017 · The Guildford Four were wrongfully convicted over the bombings in one of the UK's worst miscarriages of justice. KRW Law said newly-released archive material contained "evidence of perverting the...
