Search results
In United States of America v.Aaron Swartz, Aaron Swartz, an American computer programmer, writer, political organizer and Internet activist, was prosecuted for multiple violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 (CFAA), after downloading academic journal articles through the MIT computer network from a source for which he had an account as a Harvard research fellow.
- United States of America v. Aaron Swartz
- Aaron Swartz
May 13, 2013 · 4) the parties and intervenors shall submit a joint proposed order for modification of the Protective Order consistent with this opinion on or before May 27, 2013. Read United States v. Swartz, 945 F. Supp. 2d 216, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database.
People also ask
What if Swartz pleaded guilty to 13 charges?
Was Aaron Swartz killed by government?
Did Swartz download documents to a computer?
Was the Cambridge police department in possession of Aaron Swartz computer equipment?
United States of America v Aaron Swartz. ". v. 1 . The Massachusetts Institute of Technology ("MIT") was and continued to be a. leading research and teaching university located in Cambridge, Massachusetts. 2. JSTOR, founded in 1 995, was and continued to be a United States-based, not-for-. journals.
May 5, 2023 · Swartz Family Trust, No. 19-2822 (2d Cir. 2023) In pleading guilty to wire fraud and tax evasion, Defendant agreed to forfeit to the Government his interests in Jreck Subs, a franchised chain of sandwich shops that he used to perpetrate his fraud. Claimants, the Swartz Family Trust and Orienta Investors, LLC filed third-party petitions ...
May 5, 2023 · In July 2017 Swartz was sentenced to 150 months’ imprisonment and ordered to pay $21,041,249 in restitution to the victims of his fraud and $4,619,340 to the Internal Revenue Service for tax evasion. On September 23, 2016, the District Court entered a preliminary order of forfeiture.
Aug 1, 2011 · See United States v. Sanchez, 635 F.2d 47, 64 (2d Cir. 1980) ("a mere trespasser has no Fourth Amendment protection in premises he occupies wrongfully"). The government has apparently complied with its obligation to produce search materials as defined in Local Rule 116.1 (C) (1) (b). Therefore, the motion to compel this additional material is ...
Jul 23, 2017 · This item represents a case in PACER, the U.S. Government's website for federal case data. If you wish to see the entire case, please consult PACER directly.
