Dec 30, 2011 ·

**1400**is**a leap****year**in the Julian calendar, which was in use in Europe at that time. However, it is not**a leap****year**according to the Gregorian calendar, the one we use today, because although**1400**...Therefore, it could be

**a leap****year**. 2000 is divisible by 100 (2000/100 = 20), So, it could not have been**a leap****year**, but 2000 is divisible 400 ( 2000/400 = 5). So, we conclude that 2000 was**a leap****year**. Will**2020**be**a leap****year**?**2020**is divisible 4 (= 505). So it could be**a leap****year****2020**is not divisible by 100 (= 20.2), so it will be**a leap**...Aug 17, 2013 ·

**Was 1400****a leap****year**. Wiki User. ∙ 2013-08-17 06 ... Best Answer. Copy. yes, but in the 1500's they discovered that every hundred years it should not be**a leap****year**unless it is divisible by 400 ...According to

**leap****year**rules: 1. Every**year**divisible by 4 is**a leap****year**, if it is not a century.2. Centuries which are divisible by 400 are**leap**years, but no other century is**a leap****year**.So, 400, 800,1200 and 2000 comes in this category.Therefore, 1200 is**a leap**yearHence, option (C) is correct. | SnapsolveWhich of the following

**year**was**leap****year**.?(A)1000 (B)1800 (C ... ... | Snapsolvewww.shutterstock.com › search ›

**leap**+year+**2020****Leap****Year****2020**Images, Stock Photos & Vectors | Shutterstock www.shutterstock.com › search ›**leap**+year+**2020**Therefore, it could be

**a leap****year**. 2000 is divisible by 100 (2000/100 = 20), So, it could not have been**a leap****year**, but 2000 is divisible 400 ( 2000/400 = 5). So, we conclude that 2000 was**a leap****year**. Will**2020**be**a leap****year**?**2020**is divisible 4 (= 505). So it could be**a leap****year****2020**is not divisible by 100 (= 20.2), so it will be**a leap**...