Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. This month's answers are taken from Wikipedia's Featured Articles – every correct answer will be the title of one of the articles listed on that page. You can play the crossword online at this link (recommended) or manually by printing out the image and clues below. Enjoy!

  2. A good article (GA) is a Wikipedia article that meets a core set of editorial standards, the good article criteria, passing through the good article nomination process successfully. They are well-written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view , stable, and illustrated, where ...

  3. People also ask

    • Evaluating Article Quality
    • Elements of Quality Articles
    • Elements of Not-So-Great Articles
    • Why Cite?
    • When Should You Cite?
    • What's Not A Good Source?
    • Watch Out For: Close Paraphrasing
    • Copyright
    • Tips on Plagiarism
    • Past Versions

    An important tool for evaluating a Wikipedia article is to look at its quality rating. Wikipedia articles are constantly being improved, and all at different rates. Some rival the best encyclopedias; others are out of date or incomplete. Volunteers will review articles and leave a rating on the Talk page. You can find this by clicking "Talk" at the...

    The best articles share certain qualities, which can serve as a model for you to strive for in your own work: 1. A clear, easy-to-understand lead section, that is, the overview at the start of the article. 2. A clear structure with several headings and subheadings arranged chronologically or by themes, with images or diagrams when appropriate. 3. B...

    You'll want to read Wikipedia critically to decide for yourself if you trust it. Here's some signs that the article may not be so great: 1. Warning banners. Often these make a statement about the article's reliability, though sometimes it's simply a suggestion for improvement. Make a note and read accordingly. 2. Are there language problems in the ...

    Everything you write on Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable source. Wikipedians are working to create an accurate encyclopedia. Adding sources means that your work can be fact-checked by these editors. Editors (yourself included) can challenge unreferenced statements by adding a [citation needed]tag in WikiCode, which adds a [citation need...

    In general, you should be citing at least once per paragraph you contribute to Wikipedia, but any quotations, hard facts (such as statistics) and controversial claims must be cited. Basically, whenever you add information to an article, be sure to include references.

    Other sources may be tempting and easy to find, but should be avoided. Poor sources include: 1. Blog posts and social media 2. Press releases and promotional material 3. Official websites 4. Self-published materials While it can be useful to run a web search to help you find good sources (such as books or scholarly articles), most search results wo...

    When you find a good source, it's important to share what you've found without plagiarising or violating the source's copyright. Paraphrasing your sources without plagiarizing them takes some practice. It can be easy to unconsciously mimic the structure and word choice of the original source. Copying words, structure, or phrases from the original s...

    Copyright is one of the reasons why close paraphrasing is not a good idea. Here you can read more about copyrightin more detail. Everything on Wikipedia is free to use. That means anything you put on Wikipedia has to be free to share, too. Copyrighted materials, including lengthy passages from books, illustrations, and photographs, don't belong on ...

    Material in your sandbox is still subject to Wikipedia’s policies, so do not copy and paste information from your sources into your sandbox.Start by taking notes of key concepts, not phrases, from your sources, noting where each came from.Write the draft from your notes rather than from the original source, so you are not unconsciously mimicking th...

    You'll see two side by side sections. The first is the original, the second is what was changed. Spot the difference? The section about "And the Wind Whispered" was removed, because it wasn't properly cited to a reliable source. You can use these comparisons to see what an editor has done to an article you're working on. It's also how your instruct...

  4. Answers for Like Wikipedia articles crossword clue, 8 letters. Search for crossword clues found in the Daily Celebrity, NY Times, Daily Mirror, Telegraph and major publications. Find clues for Like Wikipedia articles or most any crossword answer or clues for crossword answers.

  5. The wikipedia page for Haitian Vodou is actually pretty darn good. KONSABA and some dedicated practitioners (there is some overlap) really took it upon themselves to fix it. It isn't perfect and it gets vandalized frequently, but it is a pretty good starting place and the reference list is great.

  6. Mar 8, 2022 · Good articles are articles that may not be as extensive as featured articles but are still excellent quality; you can browse a collection of these articles at Wikipedia:Good articles (shortcut WP:GA).

  7. On Nov. 1, Wikipedia announced a mind-boggling milestone: Its English edition has logged 5 million entrie s since its launch in 2001. That’s a profound accomplishment — but also overwhelming ...

  1. People also search for